/**
     * Verifies that the provided CRUD mode matches the expected mode.
     * Throws a validation error if the modes do not match.
     *
     * @param crudMode the actual CRUD mode
     * @param expectedMode the expected CRUD mode
     */
    protected void verifyCrudMode(final int crudMode, final int expectedMode) {
        if (crudMode != expectedMode) {

  /*
   * We have a whole series of abstract test classes that "stack", so e.g. the tests for filtered
   * NavigableSets inherit the tests for filtered Iterables, Collections, Sets, and SortedSets. The
   * actual implementation tests are further down.
   */

  public abstract static class AbstractFilteredIterableTest<C extends Iterable<Integer>>
      extends TestCase {
    abstract C createUnfiltered(Iterable<Integer> contents);

        ACE[] result = msrpcShareGetInfo.getSecurity();
        assertNull(result);
    }

    @Test
    void testGetSecurityWithMismatchedSize() throws Exception {
        // Test when sd_size doesn't match actual array size
        srvsvc.ShareInfo502 info502 = new srvsvc.ShareInfo502();
        info502.security_descriptor = new byte[] { 1, 2, 3, 4 };

            // When
            copy.encode(buffer, startIndex);

            // Then
            // The implementation skips 4 reserved bytes without writing zeros
            // This is consistent with the actual implementation behavior
            // The reserved bytes remain as they were in the buffer
            for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
                assertEquals((byte) 0xFF, buffer[startIndex + SOURCE_KEY_SIZE + 4 + i],

//
// - inherited from parent - this is the case for AssumeRole API, where the
// parent user is an actual real user with their own (permanent) credentials and
// policy association.
//
// - inherited from "virtual" parent - this is the case for AssumeRoleWithLDAP
// where the parent user is the DN of the actual LDAP user. The parent user
// itself cannot login, but the policy associated with them determines the base

        updater.close();
    }

    public void test_ProtwordsUpdater_fileCreationException() {
        // This test verifies that ProtwordsUpdater constructor properly handles exceptions
        // The actual exception handling is tested by ensuring the updater can be created
        // and properly closed even when errors might occur

        protwordsFile.reload(null);

 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new immutable array containing the values in the specified range.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> The returned array has the same full memory footprint as this one
   * does (no actual copying is performed). To reduce memory usage, use {@code subArray(start,
   * end).trimmed()}.
   */
  public ImmutableLongArray subArray(int startIndex, int endIndex) {

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new immutable array containing the values in the specified range.
   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> The returned array has the same full memory footprint as this one
   * does (no actual copying is performed). To reduce memory usage, use {@code subArray(start,
   * end).trimmed()}.
   */
  public ImmutableIntArray subArray(int startIndex, int endIndex) {

            // Since FLAGS2_RESOLVE_PATHS_IN_DFS is 0x1000, when cast to byte it becomes 0
            // Therefore the method will always return false unless flags has all 0x00 bits set
            // This test verifies actual behavior
            testBlock.setFlags((byte) 0x00);
            assertFalse(testBlock.isResolveInDfs());

            // The correct implementation should check flags2, not flags