*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

        // Something was parsed. It's possible the entire string was not consumed but we ignore
        // that. If any of the BROWSER_COMPATIBLE_DATE_FORMAT_STRINGS ended in "'GMT'" we'd have
        // to also check that position.getIndex() == value.length() otherwise parsing might have
        // terminated early, ignoring things like "+01:00". Leaving this as != 0 means that any
        // trailing junk is ignored.
        return result
      }
    }

        assertEquals(0, c.getDeclaredMethods().length, "No declared methods expected");
        assertEquals(0, c.getDeclaredConstructors().length, "Interfaces have no constructors");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Fields are public static final Strings with expected values")
    void fieldModifiersAndTypes() throws Exception {

 *  Fix: Don't miss whole operation timeouts when calls redirect.
 *  Fix: Don't leak connections if web sockets have malformed responses or if `onOpen()` throws.
 *  Fix: Don't retry when request bodies fail due to `FileNotFoundException`.
 *  Fix: Don't crash when URLs have IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses.
 *  Fix: Don't crash when building `HandshakeCertificates` on Android API 28.

                    EmptyIterator iterator3 = new EmptyIterator()) {
                assertFalse(iterator1.hasNext(), "First instance should have no elements");
                assertFalse(iterator2.hasNext(), "Second instance should have no elements");
                assertFalse(iterator3.hasNext(), "Third instance should have no elements");

                assertNull(iterator1.next(), "First instance next() should return null");