"""
Regression test: Ensure app-level responses with Union models and content/examples
don't accumulate duplicate $ref entries in anyOf arrays.
See https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14463
"""

from fastapi import FastAPI
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
from pydantic import BaseModel


class ModelA(BaseModel):
    a: str


class ModelB(BaseModel):
    b: str

"""
Regression test, Error 422 if Form is declared before File
See https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/discussions/9116
"""

from pathlib import Path
from typing import Annotated

import pytest
from fastapi import FastAPI, File, Form
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient

app = FastAPI()


@app.post("/file_before_form")
def file_before_form(
    file: bytes = File(),
    city: str = Form(),
):

    python_bin="python"
  fi
  tfrun "$python_bin" tensorflow/tools/ci_build/update_version.py --nightly
fi

if [[ $(uname -s) != MSYS_NT* ]]; then
  tfrun bazel $TFCI_BAZEL_BAZELRC_ARGS test $TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS --config=linux_libtensorflow_test
  tfrun bazel $TFCI_BAZEL_BAZELRC_ARGS build $TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS --config=linux_libtensorflow_build
else

                        postcard.setClusterstatus(ping.getClusterStatus());
                    });
                } catch (final Exception e) {
                    logger.warn("Failed to send a test mail.", e);
                } finally {
                    SMailCallbackContext.clearPreparedMessageHookOnThread();
                }
            }
            resultBuf.append("Status of ")

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.EnumSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a {@code
 * SortedSetMultimap} implementation.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class SortedSetMultimapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V>

  /**
   * A map of contents pre-created before experiment starts to only measure map creation cost. The
   * implementation for the creation of contents is independent and could be different from that of
   * the map under test.
   */
  Map<Element, Element> contents;

  /** Map pre-created before experiment starts to only measure iteration cost during experiment. */
  Map<Element, Element> map;

  CollectionBenchmarkSampleData elems;

  protected static final int EXCEPTION_DATA = -1;
  protected static final int VALID_INPUT_DATA = 1;
  protected static final Exception EXCEPTION = new Exception("Test exception");

  protected SettableFuture<Integer> inputFuture;
  protected ListenableFuture<T> resultFuture;
  protected MockFutureListener listener;

  @Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {

import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Basher test for {@link AtomicLongMap}.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
@J2ktIncompatible // threads
@GwtIncompatible // threads
@NullUnmarked
public class AtomicLongMapBasherTest extends TestCase {

 *
 */
@PlexusTest
@Deprecated
public abstract class AbstractConflictResolverTest {
    // constants --------------------------------------------------------------

    private static final String GROUP_ID = "test";

    // fields -----------------------------------------------------------------

    protected Artifact a1;

    protected Artifact a2;

    protected Artifact b1;

    private final String roleHint;

    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.