HashFunction hasher = Hashing.goodFastHash(i);
      assertTrue(hasher.bits() >= i);
      HashTestUtils.assertInvariants(hasher);
    }
  }

  // goodFastHash(32) uses Murmur3_32. Use the same epsilon bounds.
  public void testGoodFastHash32() {
    HashTestUtils.check2BitAvalanche(Hashing.goodFastHash(32), 250, 0.20);
    HashTestUtils.checkAvalanche(Hashing.goodFastHash(32), 250, 0.17);

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should create response with same configuration and buffer")
        void testCreateResponseConfiguration() {
            Smb2ReadResponse response = request.createResponse(mockContext, request);
            assertNotNull(response);
            // Response should be created with the same config from context
            verify(mockContext, times(1)).getConfig();
        }

		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-append-2-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-append-2-2"}},
		&Pet{Name: "pet-slice-append-3"},
	)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, users, "Pets", 10, "After Append")

	// Replace -> same as append
	DB.Model(&users).Association("Pets").Replace(
		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-replace-1-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-replace-1-2"}},
		[]*Pet{{Name: "pet-slice-replace-2-1"}, {Name: "pet-slice-replace-2-2"}},

      }

    return dateFormat.format(date)
  }

  /**
   * A timestamp like "191216030210Z" or "20191215190210-0800" for 2019-12-15T19:02:10-08:00. This
   * is the same as [UTC_TIME] with the exception of the 4-digit year.
   */
  val GENERALIZED_TIME =
    BasicDerAdapter(
      name = "GENERALIZED TIME",
      tagClass = DerHeader.TAG_CLASS_UNIVERSAL,
      tag = 24L,

 * <i>left</i>. Only one thread may occupy a given monitor at any moment. A monitor is also
 * reentrant, so a thread may enter a monitor any number of times, and then must leave the same
 * number of times. The <i>enter</i> and <i>leave</i> operations have the same synchronization
 * semantics as the built-in Java language synchronization primitives.
 *
 * <p>A call to any of the <i>enter</i> methods with <b>void</b> return type should always be

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *