}

  private void assertBad(String spec) {
    try {
      HostSpecifier.fromValid(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown IllegalArgumentException: " + spec);
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }

    try {
      HostSpecifier.from(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown ParseException: " + spec);
    } catch (ParseException expected) {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

	OSX_VERSION="10.8"
	KNAME=$(uname -s)
	ARCH=$(uname -m)
	case "${KNAME}" in
	SunOS)
		ARCH=$(isainfo -k)
		;;
	esac
}

## FIXME:
## In OSX, 'readlink -f' option does not exist, hence
## we have our own readlink -f behavior here.
## Once OSX has the option, below function is good enough.
##
## readlink() {
##     return /bin/readlink -f "$1"
## }
##
readlink() {
	TARGET_FILE=$1

   * returns the low 64 bits of the result.
   *
   * @since 14.0
   */
  public UnsignedLong plus(UnsignedLong val) {
    return fromLongBits(this.value + checkNotNull(val).value);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the result of subtracting this and {@code val}. If the result would have more than 64
   * bits, returns the low 64 bits of the result.

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

        assertNotNull(buffer1, "First buffer should not be null");
        assertNotNull(buffer2, "Second buffer should not be null");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer1.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertEquals(1024, buffer2.length, "Buffer should have expected size");
        assertNotSame(buffer1, buffer2, "Different calls should return different buffers initially");
    }

    @Test