import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/** Methods factored out so that they can be emulated differently in GWT. */
@GwtCompatible
final class TestPlatform {
  static void verifyGetOnPendingFuture(Future<?> future) {
    checkNotNull(future);
    try {

  public void testLog2HalfEven() {
    for (BigInteger x : POSITIVE_BIGINTEGER_CANDIDATES) {
      int halfEven = BigIntegerMath.log2(x, HALF_EVEN);
      // Now figure out what rounding mode we should behave like (it depends if FLOOR was
      // odd/even).
      boolean floorWasEven = (BigIntegerMath.log2(x, FLOOR) & 1) == 0;

...we declared the `response_model` to be our model `UserOut`, that doesn't include the password:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial003_py310.py hl[22] *}

So, **FastAPI** will take care of filtering out all the data that is not declared in the output model (using Pydantic).

### `response_model` or Return Type { #response-model-or-return-type }

				sys.hMutex.Unlock()
			}
			hcTimer.Reset(defaultHealthCheckDuration)
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return
		}
	}
}

// periodically rebuild the healthCheck map from list of targets to clear
// out stale endpoints
func (sys *BucketTargetSys) reloadHealthCheckers(ctx context.Context) {
	m := make(map[string]epHealth)
	tgts := sys.ListTargets(ctx, "", "")
	sys.hMutex.Lock()
	for _, t := range tgts {

rit;border-style:solid;border-width:0;border-inline-end-width:var(--bs-border-width);border-radius:0;-webkit-transition:color .15s ease-in-out,background-color .15s ease-in-out,border-color .15s ease-in-out,box-shadow .15s ease-in-out;transition:color .15s ease-in-out,background-color .15s ease-in-out,border-color .15s ease-in-out,box-shadow .15s ease-in-out}.form-control::file-selector-button{padding:.375rem .75rem;margin:-.375rem -.75rem;-webkit-margin-end:.75rem;margin-inline-end:.75rem;color...

        .build();

    try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
      if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

      System.out.println(response.handshake().cipherSuite());
      System.out.println(response.body().string());
    }
  }

  public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
    new CustomCipherSuites().run();
  }

        Headers responseHeaders = response.headers();
        for (int i = 0; i < responseHeaders.size(); i++) {
          System.out.println(responseHeaders.name(i) + ": " + responseHeaders.value(i));
        }

        throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);
      }

      System.out.println(response.body().string());
    }
  }

  public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {

  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter
  //   is). If we wanted to be strict about it, we could store the unpark() time in the Waiter node
  //   and we could use that to make a decision about whether or not we timed out prior to being
  //   unparked.

  @SuppressWarnings({

    for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
      bf.put(Ints.toByteArray(i));
    }

    ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
    bf.writeTo(out);

    BloomFilter<byte[]> read =
        BloomFilter.readFrom(new ByteArrayInputStream(out.toByteArray()), funnel);
    assertThat(read).isEqualTo(bf);
    assertThat(read.expectedFpp()).isGreaterThan(0);
  }

  /**

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override