// even before the arguments from the command line are parsed.  Any exception
            // that would happen here should cause the build to fail at a later stage
            // (when actually parsing the POM) and will lead to a better exception being
            // displayed to the user, so just bail out and return false.
        }
        return false;
    }

	if versionID == "" {
		versionID = nullVersionID
	}

	fi.Data = inData.find(versionID)
	if len(fi.Data) == 0 {
		// PR #11758 used DataDir, preserve it
		// for users who might have used master
		// branch
		fi.Data = inData.find(fi.DataDir)
	}
	return fi, nil
}

// hashDeterministicString will return a deterministic hash for the map values.

  * Use optimized image based on Jessie by default
  * Add support for Ubuntu Wily
  * Master is configured with automatic restart-on-failure, via CloudWatch
  * Bootstrap reworked to be more similar to GCE; better supports reboots/restarts
  * Use an elastic IP for the master by default
  * Experimental support for node spot instances (set NODE\_SPOT\_PRICE=0.05)

#### GCE

/**
 * Utility class for handling Base64 encoding and decoding.
 * <p>
 * This class now uses the standard {@link java.util.Base64} implementation
 * instead of a custom implementation, providing better security and performance.
 * The API remains backward compatible with previous versions.
 * </p>
 *
 * @author higa
 */
public abstract class Base64Util {

    /**
     * Do not instantiate.
     */

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utility class for being able to seed a {@link Random} value with a passed in seed from a
 * benchmark parameter.
 *
 * <p>TODO: Remove this class once Caliper has a better way.
 *
 * @author Nicholaus Shupe
 */
@NullUnmarked
public final class SpecialRandom extends Random {
  public static SpecialRandom valueOf(String s) {

     *
     * @see jcifs.BufferCache#releaseBuffer(byte[])
     */
    @Override
    public void releaseBuffer(final byte[] buf) {
        if (buf == null) {
            return;
        }
        // better safe than sorry: prevent leaks if there is some out of bound access
        Arrays.fill(buf, (byte) 0);
        synchronized (this.cache) {
            if (this.freeBuffers < this.cache.length) {

 */
package org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.filter;

import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Filter to only retain objects in the given scope or better. This implementation allows the accumulation of multiple
 * scopes and their associated implied scopes, so that the user can filter apply a series of implication rules in a

            """
        ),
    ] = None,
    pattern: Annotated[
        Optional[str],
        Doc(
            """
            RegEx pattern for strings.
            """
        ),
    ] = None,
    regex: Annotated[
        Optional[str],
        Doc(
            """
            RegEx pattern for strings.
            """
        ),
        deprecated(

### Is concurrency better than parallelism? { #is-concurrency-better-than-parallelism }

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.filter;

import org.apache.maven.artifact.Artifact;

/**
 * Filter to only retain objects in the given artifactScope or better.
 *
 */
abstract class AbstractScopeArtifactFilter implements ArtifactFilter {

    private boolean compileScope;

    private boolean runtimeScope;

    private boolean testScope;