}

    protected PromptBuilder confirmPrompt(PromptBuilder promptBuilder) {
        promptBuilder
                .createConfirmPromp()
                .name("confirm")
                .message("Are values above correct?")
                .defaultValue(ConfirmChoice.ConfirmationValue.YES)
                .addPrompt();
        return promptBuilder;
    }

    protected PromptBuilder dispatcherPrompt(PromptBuilder promptBuilder) {

        Throwable[] suppressed = mainException.getSuppressed();
        assertEquals(1, suppressed.length);
        assertEquals(suppressedException, suppressed[0]);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should provide correct cause for constructor with cause only")
    void testCauseOnlyConstructorMessage() {
        // Given
        RuntimeException cause = new RuntimeException("Specific cause message");

        // When

        assertNotNull(info);
        assertTrue(info.toString().contains("endOfFile=" + endOfFile));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test getFileInformationLevel returns correct value")
    void testGetFileInformationLevel() {
        assertEquals(FileInformation.FILE_ENDOFFILE_INFO, fileInfo.getFileInformationLevel());

        // Test with parameterized constructor

        byte[] expectedHash = preauthService.getCurrentPreauthHash(sessionId);

        // Validation should pass with correct hash
        assertTrue(preauthService.validatePreauthIntegrity(sessionId, expectedHash));

        // Validation should fail with incorrect hash
        byte[] incorrectHash = new byte[expectedHash.length];
        secureRandom.nextBytes(incorrectHash);

You can also pass the file path to the `fastapi dev` command, and it will guess the FastAPI app object to use:

```console
$ fastapi dev main.py
```

But you would have to remember to pass the correct path every time you call the `fastapi` command.

    @ValueSource(ints = { -1, 0, 13, 15, 99 })
    @DisplayName("seq ctor: invalid msgType values throw")
    void sequenceConstructor_invalidMsgType_throws(int badType) throws Exception {
        // Arrange: correct version, wrong msg type
        ASN1EncodableVector v = new ASN1EncodableVector();
        v.add(new DERTaggedObject(true, 0, new ASN1Integer(Integer.parseInt(KerberosConstants.KERBEROS_VERSION))));

            System.out.println(commit + " is a merge commit already on a release branch, ignoring.");
            System.out.println("  Branches: " + commitBranches);
            return;
        }

        // The correct state we are looking for is:
        // 1. It's a merge commit.
        // 2. One of its parent commits is from master only.
        // 3. Another parent commit is not from master but from release branch.

## Official Guide { #official-guide }

Pydantic has an official [Migration Guide](https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/migration/) from v1 to v2.

It also includes what has changed, how validations are now more correct and strict, possible caveats, etc.

You can read it to understand better what has changed.

## Tests { #tests }

        Set<RequestData> result = crawlerThread.getAnchorSet(urls);
        assertNotNull(result, "getAnchorSet should return valid URLs only");
        assertEquals(3, result.size());

        // Verify the URLs are correct
        List<String> resultUrls = new ArrayList<>();
        for (RequestData rd : result) {
            resultUrls.add(rd.getUrl());
        }

        assertTrue(resultUrls.contains("http://example.com/valid1"));

 *
 * the access check would fail because the direct ACE has an access mask
 * of <code>0x001200A9</code> which doesn't have the
 * <code>FILE_WRITE_DATA</code> bit on (bit <code>0x00000002</code>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If
 * <code>WNET\alice</code> is in the local <code>Administrators</code> group the access check
 * will succeed because the inherited ACE allows local <code>Administrators</code>