new AbstractFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          public String pendingToString() {
            return "cause=[Because this test isn't done]";
          }
        };
    assertThat(testFuture.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, info=\\[cause=\\[Because this test isn't done\\]\\]\\]");
    TimeoutException e = assertThrows(TimeoutException.class, () -> testFuture.get(1, NANOSECONDS));

the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -
since MinIO will attempt to migrate any existing IAM data - the boot process may
take slightly longer, but may not be visibly noticeable. Once the migration has

            } else {
                logger.error(entry.message());
                for (Throwable cause = entry.error();
                        cause != null && cause != cause.getCause();
                        cause = cause.getCause()) {
                    logger.log(entry.level(), "Caused by: " + cause.getMessage());
                }
            }
        }
    }

                problemsList.add(modelProblem);
            }
        }

        return success(model, problemsList);
    }

    /**
     * Error with problems describing the cause
     *
     * @param problems
     */
    public static <T> Result<T> error(Iterable<? extends ModelProblem> problems) {
        return error(null, problems);
    }

    public static <T> Result<T> error(T model) {

errors.not_found_on_file_system = Not found. Cause: {0}
errors.could_not_open_on_system = Could not open {0}.<br>Please check if the file is associated with an application.
errors.result_size_exceeded = No more results can be displayed.
errors.target_file_does_not_exist = The file {0} does not exist.
errors.failed_to_delete_file = Failed to delete the file {0}.
errors.docid_not_found = Doc ID is not found. Cause: {0}

errors.not_found_on_file_system = Not found. Cause: {0}
errors.could_not_open_on_system = Could not open {0}.<br>Please check if the file is associated with an application.
errors.result_size_exceeded = No more results can be displayed.
errors.target_file_does_not_exist = The file {0} does not exist.
errors.failed_to_delete_file = Failed to delete the file {0}.
errors.docid_not_found = Doc ID is not found. Cause: {0}

    void startEvent(String eventName, String target, long timestamp);

    void endEvent(String eventName, String target, long timestamp);

    void errorEvent(String eventName, String target, long timestamp, Throwable cause);

- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
- [ ] Optimization (provides speedup with no functional changes)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

## Checklist:
- [ ] Fixes a regression (If yes, please add `commit-id` or `PR #` here)
- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
- [ ] Internal documentation updated

        verify(treeHandle, never()).acquire();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor should handle null parent")
    void testConstructor_NullParent_ThrowsNPE() {
        // When & Then: Null parent should cause NullPointerException
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new NetServerEnumIterator(null, treeHandle, "*", 0, null));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor should handle null tree handle")

	// metacacheSharePrefix controls whether prefixes on dirty paths are always shared.
	// This will make `test/a` and `test/b` share listings if they are concurrent.
	// Enabling this will make cache sharing more likely and cause less IO,
	// but may cause additional latency to some calls.
	metacacheSharePrefix = false
)

//go:generate msgp -file $GOFILE -unexported

// metacache contains a tracked cache entry.
type metacache struct {