Active:   true,
	}}

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("errors happened when create: %v", err)
	}

	var name string
	var total int
	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Select("name, sum(age)").Where("name = ?", "groupby").Group("name").Row().Scan(&name, &total); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happen, but got %v", err)
	}

	if name != "groupby" || total != 60 {

		*GetUser("distinct", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-2", Config{}),
		*GetUser("distinct-3", Config{}),
	}
	users[0].Age = 20

	if err := DB.Create(&users).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when create users: %v", err)
	}

	var names []string
	DB.Table("users").Where("name like ?", "distinct%").Order("name").Pluck("name", &names)

One example is when one of the most popular plugins started requiring Java 17 because the underlying framework behind the plugin began requiring 17, and code from the framework was used in the plugin itself.
What would have happened if Gradle was limited to _only Java 11_ at the time?

## Decision

1. The Gradle distribution will never include a Java runtime.
   Instead, Gradle will leverage Java toolchains for the Daemon and worker processes.

    // useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.
    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers).containsExactly(i1, i2, i3, s1, s1, s1, s1, s2, s2, s2, s2);
  }

  public void testImmediateDispatcher() {
    dispatcher = Dispatcher.immediate();

    /*
     * We need to wait for the runner to exit. It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
     * busy loop when interrupt threw.
     *
     * While we're at it, we confirm that the interrupt happened as expected.
     */
    ExecutionException fromRunInterruptibly =
        assertThrows(ExecutionException.class, () -> taskResult.get(10, SECONDS));

      if (e.getCause() instanceof IllegalArgumentException) {
        /*
         * IllegalArgumentException is the one unchecked exception that we know is likely to happen
         * (thanks to the checkArgument calls in getAnnotatedMethodsNotCached). If it happens, we'd
         * prefer to propagate an IllegalArgumentException to the caller. However, we don't want to

    // drop the contract on the method that enforces this queue like behavior since depending on it
    // is likely to be a bug anyway.

    // N.B. All writes to the list and the next pointers must have happened before the above
    // synchronized block, so we can iterate the list without the lock held here.
    RunnableExecutorPair reversedList = null;
    while (list != null) {
      RunnableExecutorPair tmp = list;

	}

	if err := DB.Create(&data).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("No error should happened when create scanner valuer struct, but got %v", err)
	}

	var result ScannerValuerStruct

	if err := DB.Find(&result, "id = ?", data.ID).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("no error should happen when query scanner, valuer struct, but got %v", err)
	}

	if result.ExampleStructPtr.Val != "value2" {

                        locationPath = topDirectory.relativize(locationPath);
                    }
                    stringBuilder.append(" (").append(locationPath).append(")");
                }
            }
            stringBuilder.append(" @ line ").append(inputLocation.getLineNumber());
            return stringBuilder.toString();
        } else {
            return "unknown";
        }
    }

	}

	var count3 int64
	if err := DB.Model(&User{}).Where("name in ?", []string{user2.Name, user2.Name, user3.Name}).Group("id").Count(&count3).Error; err != nil {
		t.Errorf("Error happened when count with group, but got %v", err)
	}

	if count3 != 2 {
		t.Errorf("Should get correct count for count with group, but got %v", count3)
	}

	dryDB := DB.Session(&gorm.Session{DryRun: true})