// Create a file larger than MAX_BUF_SIZE (10MB)
        // Write 11MB of data
        try (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(largeFile)) {
            final byte[] chunk = new byte[1024 * 1024]; // 1MB
            for (int i = 0; i < 11; i++) { // Write 11MB
                fos.write(chunk);
            }
        }

        try {
            FileUtil.readBytes(largeFile);

  Similarly you can also access  kubelet's `/pods` endpoint to fetch a list of Pods bound to that node by granting the caller `nodes/pods` permission in RBAC.
  Similarly you can also access kubelet's `/configz` endpoint to fetch kubelet's configuration by granting the caller `nodes/configz` permission in RBAC.

            FileOutputStream fos = null;
            try {
                newFile = ComponentUtil.getSystemHelper().createTempFile(KUROMOJI, ".txt");
                fos = new FileOutputStream(newFile);
                writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(fos, Constants.UTF_8));
                fos = null; // Successfully wrapped, no need to close explicitly

consequence of this change the Kubelet now correctly takes into account the resources of running and terminating pods when deciding to accept new pods, since terminating pods are still holding on to those resources. This stricter handling may surface to end users as pod rejections when creating pods that are scheduled to mostly full nodes that have other terminating pods holding the resources the new pods need. The most likely error would be a pod set to `Failed` phase with reason set to `OutOfCpu` or `OutOfMemory`,...

/tensorflow/lite/**/ios/BUILD
/tensorflow/lite/**/objc/BUILD
/tensorflow/lite/**/swift/BUILD
/tensorflow/lite/examples/ios/simple/data/*.tflite
/tensorflow/lite/examples/ios/simple/data/*.txt
Podfile.lock
Pods

            FileOutputStream fos = null;
            try {
                newFile = ComponentUtil.getSystemHelper().createTempFile(SYNONYM, ".txt");
                fos = new FileOutputStream(newFile);
                writer = new BufferedWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(fos, Constants.UTF_8));
                fos = null; // Successfully wrapped, no need to close explicitly

            tempFile.setReadable(true, true);
            tempFile.setWritable(false, false);
            tempFile.setWritable(true, true);
            try (final FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(tempFile)) {
                CopyUtil.copy(is, fos);
            }
        } catch (final Exception e) {
            FileUtil.deleteInBackground(tempFile); // clean up

certificates](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/operations/network-encryption.html).

For a [distributed MinIO setup](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/operations/deployments/kubernetes.html), where there are multiple pods with different domain names expected to run, you will either need wildcard certificates valid for all the domains or have specific certificates for each domain. If you are going to use specific certificates, make sure to create Kubernetes secrets accordingly....

- In clusters where the DryRun feature...

- Fix a bug that Pods could stuck in the unschedulable pod pool 
  if they're rejected by PreEnqueue plugins that could change its result by a change in resources apart from Pods.
  
  DRA plugin is the only plugin that meets the criteria of the bug in in-tree, 
  and hence if you have `DynamicResourceAllocation` feature flag enabled,