return
	}

	m.wg.Add(1)
	defer m.wg.Done()

	if atomic.LoadInt32(&m.closing) == 1 {
		return
	}

	select {
	case m.opCh <- op:
	default:
	}
}

// Do not accept new MRF operations anymore and start to save
// the current heal status in one available disk
func (m *mrfState) shutdown() {
	atomic.StoreInt32(&m.closing, 1)
	m.wg.Wait()
	close(m.opCh)
	atomic.StoreInt32(&m.closed, 1)

If you have this specific use case using SQLModel (or SQLAlchemy), you could explicitly close the session after you don't need it anymore:

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial014_an_py310.py ln[24:28] hl[28] *}

That way the session would release the database connection, so other requests could use it.

}

// DeleteKey deletes a key at the KMS with the given key ID.
// Please note that is a dangerous operation.
// Once a key has been deleted all data that has been encrypted with it cannot be decrypted
// anymore, and therefore, is lost.
func (c *kesConn) DeleteKey(ctx context.Context, req *DeleteKeyRequest) error {
	if err := c.client.DeleteKey(ctx, req.Name); err != nil {
		if errors.Is(err, kes.ErrKeyNotFound) {

			break
		}

		if !srcEOF && srcCtnt.Err != nil {
			log.Fatal(srcCtnt.Err)
		}

		if !tgtEOF && tgtCtnt.Err != nil {
			log.Fatal(tgtCtnt.Err)
		}

		// If source doesn't have objects anymore, comparison becomes obvious
		if srcEOF {
			fmt.Printf("only in target: %s\n", tgtCtnt.Key)
			tgtCtnt, tgtOk = <-tgtCh
			continue
		}

		// The same for target
		if tgtEOF {

     */
    @Override
    public String getHostName() {
        /*
         * 2010 - We no longer try a Node Status to get the
         * hostname because apparently some servers do not respond
         * anymore. I think everyone post Windows 98 will accept
         * an IP address as the tconHostName which is the principal
         * use of this method.
         */
        if (this.hostName.isUnknown()) {

                throws CIFSException {
            super(th, parent, wildcard, filter, searchAttributes);
        }

        TestIterator throwOnOpen() {
            // This method doesn't make sense anymore with static approach
            return this;
        }

        TestIterator throwOnFetch() {
            this.throwOnFetch = true;
            return this;
        }

        end
        handler -->> client: HTTP error response
    end

    operation ->> client: Return response to client
    Note over client,operation: Response is already sent, can't change it anymore
    opt Tasks
        operation -->> tasks: Send background tasks
    end
    opt Raise other exception
        tasks -->> tasks: Handle exceptions in the background task code
    end
```

/// info

- Seal the KMS such that it cannot be accessed by MinIO server anymore. That will lock **all** SSE-S3 encrypted objects protected by master keys stored on the KMS. All these objects can not be decrypted as long as the KMS is sealed.

        end
        handler -->> client: HTTP error response
    end

    operation ->> client: Return response to client
    Note over client,operation: Response is already sent, can't change it anymore
    opt Tasks
        operation -->> tasks: Send background tasks
    end
    opt Raise other exception
        tasks -->> tasks: Handle exceptions in the background task code
    end
```

   * 1. Both superclass toArray methods assume that size() gives a correct answer, while our size()
   * might not (and the answer might change while we're building the array).
   *
   * TODO: cpovirk - Is this an issue anywhere anymore? It looks to have been fixed for Java 8
   * (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7121314) and before Lollipop
   * (https://r.android.com/47508). We *would* need to worry for J2KT, whose own concurrency support