# Fixes "fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository" for Docker.
    git config --system --add safe.directory '*'
    git config --system protocol.file.allow always

    # Note that you could generate a list of all the affected targets with e.g.:
    # bazel query $(paste -sd "+" $BATS_FILE_TMPDIR/changed_files) --keep_going
    # Only shows Added, Changed, Modified, Renamed, and Type-changed files

to the test, or change code_check_full.bats in the SIG Build repository. That's
https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/tensorflow/tools/tf_sig_build_dockerfiles/devel.usertools/code_check_full.bats
Here are the affected tests:
EOF
    while read dep; do
      echo "For dependency $dep:"
      # For every missing dependency, find the tests which directly depend on

        this.flags = WITNESS_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN;
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new witness notification.
     *
     * @param eventType the type of event
     * @param resourceName the name of the affected resource
     */
    public WitnessNotification(WitnessEventType eventType, String resourceName) {
        this.eventType = eventType;
        this.resourceName = resourceName;

        // Modify original array - should not affect stored password
        passwordChars[0] = 'X';
        String retrievedPassword2 = authenticator.getPassword();
        assertEquals("charArrayPassword", retrievedPassword2, "Stored password should not be affected by external changes");
    }

    @Test
    public void testNullPasswordHandling() {

  - type: input
    id: go-toolchain
    attributes:
      label: Changes to Go ToolChain
      description: "How many tools (such as vet, gopls, gofmt, goimports, etc.) would be affected? "
    validations:
      required: false

  - type: input
    id: perf-costs
    attributes:
      label: Performance Costs
      description: "What is the compile time cost? What is the run time cost? "

	expected := "foo"
	now := time.Now()
	cc := CustomizeColumn{ID: 666, Name: expected, Date: &now}

	if count := DB.Create(&cc).RowsAffected; count != 1 {
		t.Error("There should be one record be affected when create record")
	}

	var cc1 CustomizeColumn
	DB.First(&cc1, "mapped_name = ?", "foo")

	if cc1.Name != expected {
		t.Errorf("Failed to query CustomizeColumn")
	}

	cc.Name = "bar"
	DB.Save(&cc)

        // Messages should remain as provided
        assertEquals(message1, exception1.getMessage());
        assertEquals(message2, exception2.getMessage());

        // Messages should not be affected by cause
        assertFalse(exception1.getMessage().equals(exception2.getMessage()));
    }

    public void test_longMessage() {
        // Test with very long message

   * whether our solution scales to use with multiple exception types and to whether it is affected
   * by other {@code ClassValue} users. Some of the benchmarked implementations don't use one or
   * both of these mechanisms, so they will be unaffected.
   */
  @Param({"0", "1", "12"})
  int otherEntriesInDataStructure;

		t.Errorf("Failed to batch find, got error %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
	}

	var sub2 []User
	// only offset
	if result := DB.Offset(3).Where("name = ?", users[0].Name).FindInBatches(&sub2, 2, func(tx *gorm.DB, batch int) error {
		return nil
	}); result.Error != nil || result.RowsAffected != 7 {
		t.Errorf("Failed to batch find, got error %v, rows affected: %v", result.Error, result.RowsAffected)
	}

		t.Errorf("found invalid user, got %v", u)
	}

	name += "Update"
	rows, err := gorm.G[User](DB).Where("id = ?", u.ID).Update(ctx, "name", name)
	if rows != 1 {
		t.Fatalf("failed to get affected rows, got %d, should be %d", rows, 1)
	}

	nu, err := gorm.G[User](DB).Where("name = ?", name).First(ctx)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("failed to find user, got error: %v", err)