package jcifs.smb1.util.transport;

/**
 * Marker interface for transport layer request objects.
 * Represents a request that can be sent through the SMB1 transport layer.
 */
public interface Request {

        return java.util.Objects.hashCode(input);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
        if (this == obj) {
            return true;
        }
        if (obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass()) {
            return false;
        }
        final StopwordsItem other = (StopwordsItem) obj;
        return java.util.Objects.equals(input, other.input);
    }

	}
}

// KafkaSHA256 is a function that returns a crypto/sha256 hasher and should be used
// to create Client objects configured for SHA-256 hashing.
var KafkaSHA256 scram.HashGeneratorFcn = sha256.New

// KafkaSHA512 is a function that returns a crypto/sha512 hasher and should be used
// to create Client objects configured for SHA-512 hashing.
var KafkaSHA512 scram.HashGeneratorFcn = sha512.New

sitea_out=$(cat /tmp/sitea_dirs.txt)
siteb_out=$(cat /tmp/siteb_dirs.txt)

if [ $sitea_count -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "BUG: expected no 'directory objects' left after deletion: ${sitea_out}"
	exit 1
fi

if [ $siteb_count -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "BUG: expected no 'directory objects' left after deletion: ${siteb_out}"
	exit 1
fi

## FAQ

> Why is this change needed?

Before, there were two separate mechanisms - S3 objects got encrypted using a KMS,
if present, and the IAM / configuration data got encrypted with the root credentials.
Now, MinIO encrypts IAM / configuration and S3 objects with a KMS, if present. This
change unified the key-management aspect within MinIO.

The unified KMS-based approach has several advantages:

        return java.util.Objects.hashCode(input);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
        if (this == obj) {
            return true;
        }
        if (obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass()) {
            return false;
        }
        final ProtwordsItem other = (ProtwordsItem) obj;
        return java.util.Objects.equals(input, other.input);
    }

    return (prefix & ~mask) | (suffix & mask);
  }

  static int remove(
      @Nullable Object key,
      @Nullable Object value,
      int mask,
      Object table,
      int[] entries,
      @Nullable Object[] keys,
      @Nullable Object @Nullable [] values) {
    int hash = Hashing.smearedHash(key);
    int tableIndex = hash & mask;
    int next = tableGet(table, tableIndex);

    return (prefix & ~mask) | (suffix & mask);
  }

  static int remove(
      @Nullable Object key,
      @Nullable Object value,
      int mask,
      Object table,
      int[] entries,
      @Nullable Object[] keys,
      @Nullable Object @Nullable [] values) {
    int hash = Hashing.smearedHash(key);
    int tableIndex = hash & mask;
    int next = tableGet(table, tableIndex);

			if err != nil {
				err = msgp.WrapError(err, "Bucket")
				return
			}
		case "lobj":
			z.Object, err = dc.ReadString()
			if err != nil {
				err = msgp.WrapError(err, "Object")
				return
			}
		case "ob":
			z.Objects, err = dc.ReadInt64()
			if err != nil {
				err = msgp.WrapError(err, "Objects")
				return
			}
		case "dm":
			z.DeleteMarkers, err = dc.ReadInt64()
			if err != nil {

     *
     * @return an array of FileEntry objects representing the shares
     */
    public FileEntry[] getEntries() {
        /*
         * The ShareInfo1 class does not implement the FileEntry
         * interface (because it is generated from IDL). Therefore
         * we must create an array of objects that do.
         */
        final srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr1 ctr = (srvsvc.ShareInfoCtr1) this.info;