// This lock protects the task so we can ensure that none of the template methods (startUp,
    // shutDown or runOneIteration) run concurrently with one another.
    // TODO(lukes): why don't we use ListenableFuture to sequence things? Then we could drop the
    // lock.
    private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();

    @WeakOuter
    final class Task implements Runnable {
      @Override
      public void run() {

    }
    assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter.onPattern(","));
  }

  /**
   * This test really pushes the boundaries of what we support. In general the splitter's behaviour
   * is not well defined if the char sequence it's splitting is mutated during iteration.
   */
  private void assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter splitter) {
    StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();

      // This guarantees a deterministic sequence when handling the canceled request:
      // 1. Server reads request and dequeues first response
      // 2. Client cancels request
      // 3. Server tries to send response on the canceled stream
      // Otherwise, there is no guarantee for the sequence. For example, the server may use the

For "synchronous" (contrary to "asynchronous") they commonly also use the term "sequential", because the computer / program follows all the steps in sequence before switching to a different task, even if those steps involve waiting.

### Concurrency and Burgers { #concurrency-and-burgers }

    }

    // ============================================================
    // System and UI Constants
    // ============================================================

    /** System line separator character sequence. */
    public static final String LINE_SEPARATOR = System.lineSeparator();

    /** Default page number for admin interface pagination. */
    public static final int DEFAULT_ADMIN_PAGE_NUMBER = 1;

	}
}

type dataAndEOFReader string

func (r dataAndEOFReader) Read(p []byte) (int, error) {
	return copy(p, r), io.EOF
}

func TestPeekThenUnreadRune(t *testing.T) {
	// This sequence used to cause a crash.
	r := NewReader(strings.NewReader("x"))
	r.ReadRune()
	r.Peek(1)
	r.UnreadRune()
	r.ReadRune() // Used to panic here
}

	// test fallback to IndexRune
	{"oxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox☺", "☺", 22},
	// invalid UTF-8 byte sequence (must be longer than bytealg.MaxBruteForce to
	// test that we don't use IndexRune)
	{"xx0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890120123456789012345678901234567890123456xxx\xed\x9f\xc0", "\xed\x9f\xc0", 105},

}

// IsValidBucketName verifies that a bucket name is in accordance with
// Amazon's requirements (i.e. DNS naming conventions). It must be 3-63
// characters long, and it must be a sequence of one or more labels
// separated by periods. Each label can contain lowercase ascii
// letters, decimal digits and hyphens, but must not begin or end with
// a hyphen. See:

    try {
      // Iterate through the parts of the ip string.
      // Invariant: start is always the beginning of a hextet, or the second ':' of the skip
      // sequence "::"
      int start = 0;
      if (ipString.charAt(0) == IPV6_DELIMITER) {
        start = 1;
      }
      while (start < ipString.length()) {
        int end = ipString.indexOf(IPV6_DELIMITER, start);

    *   Added a new `rerandomize_each_iteration` argument for the `tf.data.Dataset.random()` operation, which controls whether the sequence of generated random numbers should be re-randomized every epoch or not (the default behavior). If `seed` is set and `rerandomize_each_iteration=True`, the `random()` operation will produce a different (deterministic) sequence of numbers every epoch.