assertEquals("user2", ((SID) resolvedFirst[1]).acctName);

        // Second call with overlap should use cache for s2 and s3, requiring only s3 if not cached
        // Mark s3 unresolved to force resolve of one element
        doAnswer(inv -> {
            SID[] toResolve = inv.getArgument(2);
            for (SID s : toResolve) {
                s.type = jcifs.SID.SID_TYPE_USER;

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableLongArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

  {

    final byte[] bytes;
    final int offset;
    final int length;

    ByteArrayByteSource(byte[] bytes) {
      this(bytes, 0, bytes.length);
    }

    // NOTE: Preconditions are enforced by slice, the only non-trivial caller.
    ByteArrayByteSource(byte[] bytes, int offset, int length) {
      this.bytes = bytes;
      this.offset = offset;
      this.length = length;
    }

    @Override

   *
   * <p>To ensure that the created instance obeys its contract, the parameters should satisfy the
   * following constraints. This is the callers responsibility and is not enforced here.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>If {@code count} is 0, {@code mean} may have any finite value (its only usage will be to
   *       get multiplied by 0 to calculate the sum), and the other parameters may have any values

			}
		}
		return -1

	fallback:
		// Switch to bytealg.Index, if available, or a brute force search when
		// IndexByte returns too many false positives.
		if haveFastIndex {
			if j := bytealg.Index(s[i-last:], b[:n]); j >= 0 {
				return i + j - last
			}
		} else {
			// If bytealg.Index is not available a brute force search is
			// ~1.5-3x faster than Rabin-Karp since n is small.
			c0 := b[last]

        }

        int startedCrawlerNum = 0;
        int activeCrawlerNum = 0;
        while (startedCrawlerNum < dataCrawlingThreadList.size()) {
            // Force to stop crawl
            if (systemHelper.isForceStop()) {
                for (final DataCrawlingThread crawlerThread : dataCrawlingThreadList) {
                    crawlerThread.stopCrawling();
                }

 *
 * <p>Disadvantages of EventBus include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>It makes the cross-references between producer and subscriber harder to find. This can
 *       complicate debugging, lead to unintentional reentrant calls, and force apps to eagerly
 *       initialize all possible subscribers at startup time.
 *   <li>It uses reflection in ways that break when code is processed by optimizers/minimizers like

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code long[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Disadvantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Memory footprint has a fixed overhead (about 24 bytes per instance).
 *   <li><i>Some</i> construction use cases force the data to be copied (though several construction
 *       APIs are offered that don't).
 *   <li>Can't be passed directly to methods that expect {@code int[]} (though the most common
 *       utilities do have replacements here).

            assertFalse(testBlock.isUseUnicode());
            testBlock.setUseUnicode(true);
            assertTrue(testBlock.isUseUnicode());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Test force unicode property")
        void testForceUnicodeProperty() {
            assertFalse(testBlock.isForceUnicode());
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Test extended security property")