class AddressTest extends BaseTest {

    @Mock
    private CIFSContext mockContext;

    @Mock
    private Address mockAddress;

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Address interface should define correct method signatures")
    void testInterfaceContract() {
        // Given
        Address address = mockAddress;

        // When & Then - verify interface methods exist and can be called

class SmbComCreateDirectoryTest {

    private Configuration mockConfig;

    @BeforeEach
    void setUp() {
        // Mock the Configuration object
        mockConfig = mock(Configuration.class);
        // Define behavior for the OEM encoding, which is used by writeString
        when(mockConfig.getOemEncoding()).thenReturn(StandardCharsets.UTF_8.name());
    }

    @Test
    void testConstructor() {

 * This form extends CreateForm to include fields necessary for updating existing role entries,
 * including tracking information for optimistic locking and audit trails.
 * Roles define permissions and access levels for users within the system.
 *
 */
public class EditForm extends CreateForm {

    /**
     * Creates a new EditForm instance.
     */
    public EditForm() {
        super();

pkg context, func WithValue(Context, interface{}, interface{}) Context
pkg context, type CancelFunc func()
pkg context, type Context interface { Deadline, Done, Err, Value }
pkg context, type Context interface, Deadline() (time.Time, bool)
pkg context, type Context interface, Done() <-chan struct
pkg context, type Context interface, Err() error
pkg context, type Context interface, Value(interface{}) interface{}

   * be upcast back to ImmutableMapEntry[] (or Object[], etc.), or allowed to escape the class.
   *
   * <p>The returned array has all its elements set to their initial null values. However, we don't
   * declare it as {@code @Nullable ImmutableMapEntry[]} because our checker doesn't require newly
   * created arrays to have a {@code @Nullable} element type even when they're created directly with

import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Use this to meta-annotate {@code XxxFeature.Require} annotations, so that those annotations can
 * be used to decide whether to apply a test to a given class-under-test.
 *
 * <p>This is needed because annotations can't implement interfaces, which is also why reflection is
 * used to extract values from the properties of the various annotations.

But you can still document it as described in [Additional Responses in OpenAPI](additional-responses.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Java 5 annotation for describing service layer security attributes.
 *
 * <p>
 * The <code>Secured</code> annotation is used to define a list of security configuration
 * attributes for business methods.
 * <p>
 * For example:
 *
 * <pre>
 * &#064;Secured({ &quot;ROLE_USER&quot; })
 * public void create(Contact contact);
 *

     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map

## Utiliser `BackgroundTasks`

Pour commencer, importez `BackgroundTasks` et définissez un paramètre dans votre *fonction de chemin* avec `BackgroundTasks` comme type déclaré.

{* ../../docs_src/background_tasks/tutorial001.py hl[1,13] *}

**FastAPI** créera l'objet de type `BackgroundTasks` pour vous et le passera comme paramètre.

## Créer une fonction de tâche