*/
    public static PrunedTag[] parse(final String value) {
        return split(value, ",").get(stream -> stream.filter(StringUtil::isNotBlank).map(v -> {
            final Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile("(\\w+)(\\[[^\\]]+\\])?(\\.[\\w\\-]+)?(#[\\w\\-]+)?");
            final Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(v.trim());
            if (matcher.matches()) {
                final PrunedTag tag = new PrunedTag(matcher.group(1));

  public abstract int flags();

  // Re-declare this as abstract to force subclasses to override.
  @Override
  public abstract String toString();

  public static CommonPattern compile(String pattern) {
    return Platform.compilePattern(pattern);
  }

  public static boolean isPcreLike() {
    return Platform.patternCompilerIsPcreLike();
  }

  private EmptyImmutableListMultimap() {
    super(ImmutableMap.of(), 0);
  }

  /*
   * TODO(b/242884182): Figure out why this helps produce the same class file when we compile most
   * of common.collect a second time with the results of the first compilation on the classpath. Or
   * just back this out once we stop doing that (which we'll do after our internal GWT setup
   * changes).
   */

</blockquote>

## Recherche

En utilisant toutes les alternatives précédentes, j'ai eu la chance d'apprendre de toutes, de prendre des idées, et de les combiner de la meilleure façon que j'ai pu trouver pour moi-même et les équipes de développeurs avec lesquelles j'ai travaillé.

Par exemple, il était clair que l'idéal était de se baser sur les annotations de type Python standard.

        void testFromUNIBytesWithOffset() {
            // Given
            String prefix = "PREFIX";
            String target = "TARGET";
            String combined = prefix + target;
            byte[] combinedBytes = combined.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16LE);
            int prefixBytes = prefix.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16LE).length;
            int targetBytes = target.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16LE).length;

   * <<in a given phase, goals order is not expected to be guaranteed nor finely tuned>>:
     it is just a consequence of the order obtained during {{{../maven-model-builder/}effective model building}},
     which combines profile activation+injection and inheritance assembly from parents,

   * known limitations are notably that:

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Immutable;

import static org.apache.maven.api.ExtensibleEnums.projectScope;

/**
 * Project scope.
 * Defines the type of source files to compile, usually either the one that compose the output package
 * (i.e. the <i>main</i> artifact) or the ones that will be used when building <i>tests</i>).
 * <p>

        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-artifact</artifactId>
        <version>2.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
        <executions>
          <execution>
            <id>compile</id>
            <phase>initialize</phase>
            <goals>
              <goal>set</goal>
            </goals>
            <configuration>
              <mainFile>dependency-classes</mainFile>

        super(params)
        final List<String> publicApiPatterns = (List<String>)params['publicApiPatterns'];
        this.publicApiPatterns = publicApiPatterns.collect { Pattern.compile(it) }
    }

    Violation maybeViolation(final JApiCompatibility member) {
        if (!(member instanceof JApiClass)) {
            return null
        }

        if (!changed(member)) {

 * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
 * limitations under the License.
 */

import me.champeau.mrjar.MultiReleaseExtension
import org.gradle.api.Project
import org.gradle.api.tasks.compile.JavaCompile
import org.gradle.kotlin.dsl.configure
import org.gradle.kotlin.dsl.named
import org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.tasks.KotlinJvmCompile

fun Project.applyJavaModules(
  moduleName: String,