/**
   * Test that verifies the resource leak fix for <a
   * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/5756">Issue #5756</a>.
   *
   * <p>This test covers a scenario where we write a smaller amount of data first, then write a
   * large amount that crosses the threshold (transitioning from "not at threshold" to "over the
   * threshold"). (We then write some more afterward.) This differs from the existing

    }

    for (C value : values) {
      if (!contains(value)) {
        return false;
      }
    }
    return true;
  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} if the bounds of {@code other} do not extend outside the bounds of this
   * range. Examples:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code [3..6]} encloses {@code [4..5]}
   *   <li>{@code (3..6)} encloses {@code (3..6)}

  private static boolean isPermutation(List<?> first, List<?> second) {
    if (first.size() != second.size()) {
      return false;
    }
    ObjectCountHashMap<?> firstCounts = counts(first);
    ObjectCountHashMap<?> secondCounts = counts(second);
    if (first.size() != second.size()) {
      return false;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < first.size(); i++) {

    @ParameterizedTest
    @DisplayName("Test decode with various ACE counts")
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 10, 100, 1000, 4096 })
    void testDecodeWithVariousAceCounts(int aceCount) throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
        // This test is theoretical as we can't create huge buffers
        // but tests the boundary conditions
        if (aceCount <= 10) { // Only test small counts practically
            byte[] buffer = new byte[2048];

			if len(cm) == 1 {
				m.Aggregated.CPU.TimesStat = &cm[0]
			} else {
				m.Errors = append(m.Errors, fmt.Sprintf("%s: Expected one CPU stat, got %d", byHostName, len(cm)))
			}
		}
		cpuCount, err := c.Counts(true)
		if err != nil {
			m.Errors = append(m.Errors, fmt.Sprintf("%s: %v (cpuCount)", byHostName, err.Error()))
		} else {
			m.Aggregated.CPU.CPUCount = cpuCount
		}

		loadStat, err := load.Avg()

It would take the same amount of time to finish with or without turns (concurrency) and you would have done the same amount of work.

            modelValueSource2 = new ProblemDetectingValueSource(modelValueSource2, "", "project.", problems);
        }

        // NOTE: Order counts here!
        List<ValueSource> valueSources = new ArrayList<>(9);

        if (projectDir != null) {
            ValueSource basedirValueSource = new PrefixedValueSourceWrapper(

   * this range map are guaranteed to read through to the returned {@code Map}.
   *
   * <p>The returned {@code Map} iterates over entries in ascending order of the bounds of the
   * {@code Range} entries.
   *
   * <p>It is guaranteed that no empty ranges will be in the returned {@code Map}.
   */
  Map<Range<K>, V> asMapOfRanges();

  /**

    token: Bearer xxxxx # optional authentication token for the notification endpoint
  
  retry:
    attempts: 10 # number of retries for the job before giving up
    delay: 500ms # least amount of delay between each retry
`
	var job BatchJobRequest
	err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(expireYaml), &job)
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatal("Failed to parse batch-job-expire yaml", err)
	}

            int size = request.size();
            assertEquals(0, size % 8, "Size should be aligned to 8-byte boundary");
        }

        @ParameterizedTest
        @DisplayName("Should calculate size for various lock counts")
        @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 })
        void testSizeWithVariousLockCounts(int lockCount) {
            Smb2Lock[] locks = new Smb2Lock[lockCount];