*
 * <p>This service allows implementations to:</p>
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Pool identical objects to reduce memory footprint</li>
 *   <li>Intern objects for faster equality comparisons</li>
 *   <li>Apply custom optimization strategies</li>
 *   <li>Transform or modify objects during building</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Implementations are discovered via the Java ServiceLoader mechanism and should

            assertEquals(Trans2QueryPathInformationResponse.SMB_QUERY_FILE_STANDARD_INFO, infoLevel.getInt(resp));
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should initialize with custom information level")
        void testConstructorWithCustomLevel() throws Exception {
            int customLevel = 0x200;
            Trans2QueryPathInformationResponse resp = new Trans2QueryPathInformationResponse(customLevel);

	Toy    Toy `gorm:"polymorphic:Owner;"`
}

type Toy struct {
	gorm.Model
	Name      string
	OwnerID   string
	OwnerType string
}

type Tools struct {
	gorm.Model
	Name     string
	CustomID string
	Type     string
}

type Company struct {
	ID   int
	Name string
}

type Language struct {
	Code string `gorm:"primarykey"`
	Name string
}

type Coupon struct {

Imagine you develop an app that allows creating invoices.

These invoices will have an `id`, `title` (optional), `customer`, and `total`.

The user of your API (an external developer) will create an invoice in your API with a POST request.

Then your API will (let's imagine):

* Send the invoice to some customer of the external developer.
* Collect the money.
* Send a notification back to the API user (the external developer).

 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work
 * with any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getParents()} that retrieves its predecessors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getParents);
 * }
 *

            Element root = document.root();

            assertEquals(namespace, root.namespaceURI(), "POM should preserve the specified namespace");
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("should handle custom modelVersion values")
        void shouldHandleCustomModelVersionValues() {
            String pomXml = PomBuilder.create()
                    .modelVersion("5.0.0")
                    .groupId("com.example")

 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code PredecessorsFunction}. It will also work
 * with any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getParents()} that retrieves its predecessors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getParents);
 * }
 *

 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},
 * which has a method {@code getChildren()} that retrieves its successors in a graph:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, MyNode::getChildren);
 * }
 *

You can build your own connection spec with a custom set of TLS versions and cipher suites. For example, this configuration is limited to three highly-regarded cipher suites. Its drawback is that it requires Android 5.0+ and a similarly current webserver.

```java

     * @throws Exception
     */
    public void testBackwardCompatibility() throws Exception {
        // These test cases ensure that the new java.util.Base64 implementation
        // produces the same output as the old custom implementation

        // Test case 1: Standard padding
        final byte[] data1 = "abc".getBytes();
        assertEquals("YWJj", Base64Util.encode(data1));

        // Test case 2: Single padding