* <p>This method has no effect (returns {@code this}) when called in GWT: it's unclear whether a
   * precomputed matcher is faster, but it certainly would consume more memory (which doesn't seem
   * like a worthwhile tradeoff in a browser).
   */
  public CharMatcher precomputed() {
    return Platform.precomputeCharMatcher(this);
  }

  private static final int DISTINCT_CHARS = Character.MAX_VALUE - Character.MIN_VALUE + 1;

  /**

До цього робота з асинхронним кодом була значно складнішою.

У попередніх версіях Python ви могли використовувати потоки (threads) або [Gevent](https://www.gevent.org/). Але код набагато складніший для розуміння, налагодження і мислення про нього.

У попередніх версіях NodeJS/Browser JavaScript ви б використовували «callbacks», що призводить до «callback hell».

İşletim sisteminizdeki "task manager" veya "system monitor" (ya da benzeri araçlar) ile bu process'lerin birçoğunu çalışır halde görebilirsiniz.

Örneğin muhtemelen aynı browser programını (Firefox, Chrome, Edge vb.) çalıştıran birden fazla process göreceksiniz. Genelde her tab için bir process, üstüne bazı ek process'ler çalıştırırlar.

<img class="shadow" src="/img/deployment/concepts/image01.png">

$ pip install "pydantic[email]"
```

///

Bu model ile hem input’u declare ediyoruz hem de output’u aynı model ile declare ediyoruz:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Artık bir browser password ile user oluşturduğunda, API response içinde aynı password’ü geri döndürecek.

Bu örnekte sorun olmayabilir; çünkü password’ü gönderen kullanıcı zaten aynı kişi.

Davor war der Umgang mit asynchronem Code jedoch deutlich komplexer und schwieriger.

In früheren Versionen von Python hätten Sie Threads oder [Gevent](https://www.gevent.org/) verwenden können. Der Code ist jedoch viel komplexer zu verstehen, zu debuggen und nachzuvollziehen.

```

///

Wir verwenden dieses Modell, um sowohl unsere Eingabe- als auch Ausgabedaten zu deklarieren:

{* ../../docs_src/response_model/tutorial002_py310.py hl[16] *}

Immer wenn jetzt ein Browser einen Benutzer mit Passwort erzeugt, gibt die API dasselbe Passwort in der Response zurück.

Hier ist das möglicherweise kein Problem, da es derselbe Benutzer ist, der das Passwort sendet.

 * the <code>SERVER</code> parameter is used to override the
 * server name service lookup to contact the server 192.168.10.15
 * (presumably known to be a master
 * browser) for the server list in workgroup <code>MYGROUP</code>.
 * </td></tr>
 *
 * </table>
 *
 * <p>A second constructor argument may be specified to augment the URL

±” ¤nullÅ , bµvKö; ª *!먵 ®¤@x ^ m§»ú—1É} 100000"},{"key":"queue_dir","value":""}]},"batch":{"_":[{"key":"replication_workers_wait","value":"0ms"},{"key":"keyrotation_workers_wait","value":"0ms"},{"key":"expiration_workers_wait","value":"0ms"}]},"browser":{"_":[{"key":"csp_policy","value":"default-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';"},{"key":"hsts_seconds","value":"0"},{"key":"hsts_include_subdomains","value":"off"},{"key":"hsts_preload","value":"off"},{"key":"referrer_policy","value":"stri...

labels.chat_filter=Filter
labels.chat_filter_search_placeholder=Suchen...
labels.chat_clear=Löschen
labels.search_file_proxy_enabled=Search File Proxy
labels.search_use_browser_locale=Use Browser Locale
labels.sso_type=SSO Type
labels.crawling_user_agent=User Agent
labels.slack_webhook_urls=Slack Webhook URLs
labels.google_chat_webhook_urls=Google Chat Webhook URLs

labels.chat_filter=Filter
labels.chat_filter_search_placeholder=Cari...
labels.chat_clear=Hapus
labels.search_file_proxy_enabled=Search File Proxy
labels.search_use_browser_locale=Use Browser Locale
labels.sso_type=SSO Type
labels.crawling_user_agent=User Agent
labels.slack_webhook_urls=Slack Webhook URLs
labels.google_chat_webhook_urls=Google Chat Webhook URLs