/**
   * Catches a bug where when constructing a service manager failed, later interactions with the
   * service could cause IllegalStateExceptions inside the partially constructed ServiceManager.
   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */
  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager() {

                 * issue on the host. There's not much we can do about it. Just
                 * to suppress NPEs that would result we can create a possibly bogus
                 * address. Pretty sure the below cannot actually thrown a UHE tho.
                 */
                try {
                    localInetAddress = InetAddress.getByName("127.0.0.1");
                } catch (final UnknownHostException ignored) {

# Deployments Concepts { #deployments-concepts }

When deploying a **FastAPI** application, or actually, any type of web API, there are several concepts that you probably care about, and using them you can find the **most appropriate** way to **deploy your application**.

Some of the important concepts are:

* Security - HTTPS
* Running on startup
* Restarts
* Replication (the number of processes running)
* Memory
* Previous steps before starting

    assertThat(c0e0.exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)
    val c1e0 = server.takeRequest()
    assertThat(c1e0.connectionIndex).isEqualTo(1)
    assertThat(c1e0.exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(0)
  }

  @Disabled("Not actually failing where expected")
  @Test
  fun disconnectAtStart() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse
        .Builder()
        .onRequestStart(CloseSocket())
        .build(),
    )

			Location:  "",
		},
	}

	value, err := assumeRole.Retrieve()
	if err != nil {
		c.Fatalf("Expected to generate STS creds, got err: %#v", err)
	}

	// Check that the LDAP sts cred is actually working.
	minioClient, err := minio.New(s.endpoint, &minio.Options{
		Creds:     cr.NewStaticV4(value.AccessKeyID, value.SecretAccessKey, value.SessionToken),
		Secure:    s.secure,

            // one is still running.
            //
            // Now, maybe we could tweak our implementation to not start the next task until the
            // callable actually completes. (We could detect completion in our wrapper
            // `AsyncCallable task`.) However, our contract also promises:
            //
            // 2. not to cancel any Future the user returned from an AsyncCallable

	}
	return b.String()
}

func (ri replicatedInfos) Action() replicationAction {
	for _, t := range ri.Targets {
		if t.Empty() {
			continue
		}
		// rely on replication action from target that actually performed replication now.
		if t.PrevReplicationStatus != replication.Completed {
			return t.ReplicationAction
		}
	}
	return replicateNone
}

and instruction selection occurs partly after code generation.
The assembler works on the semi-abstract form, so
when you see an instruction like <code>MOV</code>
what the toolchain actually generates for that operation might
not be a move instruction at all, perhaps a clear or load.
Or it might correspond exactly to the machine instruction with that name.

 * potential deadlock, this class treats {@code ReadWriteLock} instances as equivalent to
 * traditional exclusive locks. Although this increases the false positives that the locks detect
 * (i.e. cycles that will not actually result in deadlock), it simplifies the algorithm and
 * implementation considerably. The assumption is that a user of this factory wishes to eliminate
 * any cyclic acquisition ordering.
 *

   * "key-grouped" iteration order described in the class documentation.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *