## Больше валидаций { #add-more-validations }

Можно также добавить параметр `min_length`:

{* ../../docs_src/query_params_str_validations/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[10] *}

## Регулярные выражения { #add-regular-expressions }

Вы можете определить <abbr title="Регулярное выражение (regex, regexp) — это последовательность символов, задающая шаблон поиска для строк.">регулярное выражение</abbr> `pattern`, которому должен соответствовать параметр:

     / __/__  ___ _____/ /__
    _\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/  '_/
   /___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\   version 2.1.0.2.6.0.0-598
      /_/

Using Scala version 2.11.8 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_112)
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.

scala>
```

- At the _scala>_ prompt, submit the job by typing the following commands, Replace node names, file name, and file location with your values:

Sie können auch einen `min_length`-Parameter hinzufügen:

{* ../../docs_src/query_params_str_validations/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[10] *}

## Reguläre Ausdrücke hinzufügen { #add-regular-expressions }

Você também pode adicionar um parâmetro `min_length`:

{* ../../docs_src/query_params_str_validations/tutorial003_an_py310.py hl[10] *}

## Adicione expressões regulares { #add-regular-expressions }

Você pode definir um `pattern` de <abbr title="Uma expressão regular, regex ou regexp é uma sequência de caracteres que define um padrão de busca para strings.">expressão regular</abbr> que o parâmetro deve corresponder:

       * VarHandle in guava-android, even if they're unused under Android, we cause errors under
       * AGP: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/7769.
       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure

<h3 id="constants">Constants</h3>

<p>
Although the assembler takes its guidance from the Plan 9 assemblers,
it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>

   *     string} has a length of zero or cannot be parsed as a {@code float} value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is {@code null}
   * @since 14.0
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  public static @Nullable Float tryParse(String string) {
    if (Doubles.FLOATING_POINT_PATTERN.matcher(string).matches()) {
      // TODO(lowasser): could be potentially optimized, but only with
      // extensive testing

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Do some sequential stuff to create the burgers
    return burgers
```

With `async def`, Python knows that, inside that function, it has to be aware of `await` expressions, and that it can "pause" ⏸ the execution of that function and go do something else 🔀 before coming back.

When you want to call an `async def` function, you have to "await" it. So, this won't work:

```Python

pkg reflect, method (Value) Grow(int) #48000
pkg reflect, method (Value) SetZero() #52376
pkg regexp/syntax, const ErrLarge ErrorCode #56041
pkg regexp/syntax, const ErrLarge = "expression too large" #56041
pkg runtime/cgo (darwin-amd64-cgo), type Incomplete struct #46731
pkg runtime/cgo (darwin-arm64-cgo), type Incomplete struct #46731
pkg runtime/cgo (freebsd-386-cgo), type Incomplete struct #46731

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Opérations asynchrones pour créer les burgers
    return burgers
```

Avec `async def`, Python sait que dans cette fonction il doit prendre en compte les expressions `await`, et qu'il peut mettre en pause ⏸ l'exécution de la fonction pour aller faire autre chose 🔀 avant de revenir.

Pour appeler une fonction définie avec `async def`, vous devez utiliser `await`. Donc ceci ne marche pas :