}

			if totalGet < throughputHighestGet {
				// Following check is for situations
				// when Writes() scale higher than Reads()
				// - practically speaking this never happens
				// and should never happen - however it has
				// been seen recently due to hardware issues
				// causes Reads() to go slower than Writes().
				//
				// Send such results anyways as this shall
				// expose a problem underneath.

     * we can override it in our non-null-guaranteeing subtypes to present a better signature to
     * their users.
     *
     * However, the checker *we* use has this special knowledge about `Collection.toArray()` anyway,
     * so in our implementation code, we can rely on that. That's why the expression below
     * type-checks.
     */

   * @param length the length of the new array
   */
  /*
   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */

    }

    /**
     * The logic used here used to be a copy of the logic used in the DefaultArtifactCollector, and this method was
     * called right before the actual version/artifactScope changes were done. However, a different set of conditionals
     * (and more information) is needed to be able to determine when and if the version and/or artifactScope changes.
     * See the two added methods, manageArtifactVersion and manageArtifactScope.

             * necessarily populated with header data because they're not writing
             * the header, only their body. But for whatever reason one might wish
             * to populate fields if the writeXxx operation needs this header data
             * for whatever reason. I copy over the uid here so it appears correct
             * in logging output. Logging of andx segments of messages inadvertantly

         * using DefaultRepositoryLayout requires us to enforce usage of the artifact's base version. This
         * transformation however contradicts the other use case of precisely obeying the repository's layout. The below
         * flag tries to detect which use case applies to make both plugins happy.
         */

{* ../../docs_src/body_nested_models/tutorial003_py310.py hl[12] *}

With this, even if you receive a request with duplicate data, it will be converted to a set of unique items.

And whenever you output that data, even if the source had duplicates, it will be output as a set of unique items.

And it will be annotated / documented accordingly too.

## Nested Models { #nested-models }

  interface A {}

  interface B {}

  public void testEquals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(newDelegatingList(LIST1))
        // Actually, this violates List#equals contract.
        // But whatever, no one is going to proxy List (hopefully).
        .addEqualityGroup(newDelegatingList(LIST1))
        .addEqualityGroup(newDelegatingList(LIST2))
        .addEqualityGroup(

   * escaping for code points if required.
   *
   * <p>Note that arrays returned by this method must not be modified once they have been returned.
   * However it is acceptable to return the same array multiple times (even for different input
   * characters).
   *
   * @param cp the Unicode code point to escape

 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change
 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code
 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*