Usar `BackgroundTasks` también funciona con el sistema de inyección de dependencias, puedes declarar un parámetro de tipo `BackgroundTasks` en varios niveles: en una *path operation function*, en una dependencia (dependable), en una sub-dependencia, etc.

**FastAPI** sabe qué hacer en cada caso y cómo reutilizar el mismo objeto, de modo que todas las tareas en segundo plano se combinan y ejecutan en segundo plano después:

      <includes>
        <include>*.cmd</include>
        <include>*.conf</include>
      </includes>
      <lineEnding>dos</lineEnding>
    </fileSet>
    <fileSet>
      <directory>target/dependency/org/jline/nativ</directory>
      <outputDirectory>lib/jline-native</outputDirectory>
      <includes>
        <include>**/*.so</include>
        <include>**/*.jnilib</include>
        <include>**/*.dll</include>

        super();
    }

    /** Logger instance for this class */
    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(FessStandardTransformer.class);

    /**
     * Initializes the transformer after dependency injection.
     * Sets up the Fess configuration and data serializer components.
     */
    @PostConstruct
    public void init() {
        if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {

### <abbr title="تزریق وابستگی">Dependency Injection</abbr>

FastAPI شامل یک سیستم <abbr title='همچنین به عنوان "components", "resources", "services" و "providers" شناخته میشود'><strong>Dependency Injection</strong></abbr> بسیار آسان اما بسیار قدرتمند است.

    public FileTypeHelper() {
        // Default constructor
    }

    /**
     * Initializes the file type mappings by loading configuration from Fess settings.
     * This method is called automatically after dependency injection is complete.
     * The mappings are loaded from the index filetype configuration property,
     * where each line contains a MIME type to file type mapping in the format "mimetype=filetype".
     */

### Dependency Injection

FastAPI bevat een uiterst eenvoudig, maar uiterst krachtig <abbr title='ook bekend als "componenten", "bronnen", "diensten", "aanbieders"'><strong>Dependency Injection</strong></abbr> systeem.

 *     <li>{@code war}: Packages the project as a Web Application Archive (WAR) file.</li>
 *     <li>{@code pom}: Indicates that the project does not produce a deployable artifact but is used for dependency management or as an aggregator.</li>
 *     <li>{@code maven-plugin}: Packages the project as a Maven plugin.</li>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h2>Usage Example</h2>
 *
 * <pre>
 * {@code

 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard

        verify(smbFile, times(1)).length();
        verifyNoMoreInteractions(smbFile);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("accept: propagates SmbException thrown by dependency")
    void accept_propagatesSmbException() throws Exception {
        // Arrange: filter delegates to isDirectory which may throw SmbException
        SmbFileFilter filter = f -> f.isDirectory();

      the current project.

      NOTE: This will likely contain much more than the direct dependencies of the
      current POM, since Maven uses transitive, or chained, dependency resolution.
    ]]></description>
  </expression>
  <expression>
    <syntax>project.parentArtifact</syntax>
    <configuration>
      <![CDATA[
    <parent>
      <groupId>project.group</groupId>