And then in our code, we parse that YAML content directly, and then we are again using the same Pydantic model to validate the YAML content:

{* ../../docs_src/path_operation_advanced_configuration/tutorial007_py310.py hl[24:31] *}

/// tip

Here we reuse the same Pydantic model.

But the same way, we could have validated it in some other way.

 * need for a distinct {@code ImmutableBiMultimap} type.
 *
 * <p><a id="iteration"></a>
 *
 * <p><b>Key-grouped iteration.</b> All view collections follow the same iteration order. In all
 * current implementations, the iteration order always keeps multiple entries with the same key
 * together. Any creation method that would customarily respect insertion order (such as {@link

import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Test cases for {@code EventBus} that must not be in the same package.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
public class OutsideEventBusTest extends TestCase {

  /*
   * If you do this test from common.eventbus.EventBusTest, it doesn't actually test the behavior.
   * That is, even if exactly the same method works from inside the common.eventbus package tests,
   * it can fail here.
   */

          newEntries[outI++] = entries[inI];
        }
      }
      return newEntries;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable map containing the same entries as {@code map}. The returned map iterates
   * over entries in the same order as the {@code entrySet} of the original map. If {@code map}
   * somehow contains entries with duplicate keys (for example, if it is a {@code SortedMap} whose

        return new IllegalArgumentException(
            "Multiple entries with same key: " + key + "=" + value1 + " and " + key + "=" + value2);
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable map containing the same entries as {@code map}. The returned map iterates
   * over entries in the same order as the {@code entrySet} of the original map. If {@code map}

 * need for a distinct {@code ImmutableBiMultimap} type.
 *
 * <p><a id="iteration"></a>
 *
 * <p><b>Key-grouped iteration.</b> All view collections follow the same iteration order. In all
 * current implementations, the iteration order always keeps multiple entries with the same key
 * together. Any creation method that would customarily respect insertion order (such as {@link

/**
 * A bimap (or "bidirectional map") is a map that preserves the uniqueness of its values as well as
 * that of its keys. This constraint enables bimaps to support an "inverse view", which is another
 * bimap containing the same entries as this bimap but with reversed keys and values.
 *
 * <h3>Implementations</h3>
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>{@link ImmutableBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link HashBiMap}
 *   <li>{@link EnumBiMap}

        final String encoded = Base64Util.encode(singleByte);
        assertNotNull("Encoded result should not be null", encoded);
        final byte[] decoded = Base64Util.decode(encoded);
        assertEquals("Decoded should have same length", 1, decoded.length);
        assertEquals("Decoded byte should match", singleByte[0], decoded[0]);
    }

    /**
     * Test encode with two bytes
     *
     * @throws Exception
     */

   *   <li>{@code proxy.toString()} delegates to {@link AbstractInvocationHandler#toString}
   *   <li>{@code proxy.equals(argument)} returns true if:
   *       <ul>
   *         <li>{@code proxy} and {@code argument} are of the same type
   *         <li>and {@link AbstractInvocationHandler#equals} returns true for the {@link
   *             InvocationHandler} of {@code argument}
   *       </ul>

   * exactly one entry for each distinct element in the multiset (thus it always has the same size
   * as the {@link #elementSet}). The order of the elements in the element set is unspecified.
   *
   * <p>The entry set is backed by the same data as the multiset, so any change to either is
   * immediately reflected in the other. However, multiset changes may or may not be reflected in