public void testAddAllAtIndex_nullSupported() {
    List<E> containsNull = singletonList(null);
    assertTrue("addAll(n, containsNull) should return true", getList().addAll(0, containsNull));
    /*
     * We need (E) to force interpretation of null as the single element of a
     * varargs array, not the array itself
     */
    expectAdded(0, (E) null);
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)

                  ListFeature.SUPPORTS_SET)
              .createTestSuite());
    }
    return suite;
  }

  // Test generators.  To let the GWT test suite generator access them, they need to be
  // public named classes with a public default constructor.

  public static final class ShortsAsListGenerator extends TestShortListGenerator {
    @Override
    protected List<Short> create(Short[] elements) {

                  ListFeature.SUPPORTS_SET)
              .createTestSuite());
    }
    return suite;
  }

  // Test generators.  To let the GWT test suite generator access them, they need to be
  // public named classes with a public default constructor.

  public static final class LongsAsListGenerator extends TestLongListGenerator {
    @Override
    protected List<Long> create(Long[] elements) {

    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of
    // Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase(), but it is a signal that its documentation may need updating as
    // regards edge cases.

    // The Unicode point {@code 00df} is the lowercase form of sharp-S (ß), whose uppercase is "SS".
    assertEquals("PASSWORD", "pa\u00dfword".toUpperCase()); // [*]

        assertArrayEquals(machineId, actualMachineId);
    }

    /**
     * Test with customData and machineId that are not exactly 8 and 32 bytes respectively.
     * The constructor requires exact sizes, so we need to pad them manually.
     */
    @Test
    void testAvSingleHostCustomDataMachineIdConstructor_ShorterInputs() {
        // Prepare padded arrays
        byte[] customData = new byte[8];

  public void testAddAllAtIndex_nullSupported() {
    List<E> containsNull = singletonList(null);
    assertTrue("addAll(n, containsNull) should return true", getList().addAll(0, containsNull));
    /*
     * We need (E) to force interpretation of null as the single element of a
     * varargs array, not the array itself
     */
    expectAdded(0, (E) null);
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)

  private static final byte[] ARRAY1 = {(byte) 1};
  private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Bytes.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Byte.hashCode(value));

          Log.println(logLevel, tag, logMessage.substring(i, end))
          i = end
        } while (i < newline)
        i++
      }
    }
  }

  private fun loggerTag(loggerName: String): String {
    // We need to handle long logger names before they hit Log.
    // java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Log tag "okhttp3.mockwebserver.MockWebServer" exceeds limit of 23 characters
    return knownLoggers[loggerName] ?: loggerName.take(23)
  }

   * Runnable}, and arrange that {@code get} will return the given result on successful completion.
   *
   * @param runnable the runnable task
   * @param result the result to return on successful completion. If you don't need a particular
   *     result, consider using constructions of the form: {@code ListenableFuture<?> f =
   *     ListenableFutureTask.create(runnable, null)}
   * @since 10.0
   */

      Arrays.asList((Integer) null, null, null, null);

  /*
   * Both of these fields *are* immutable/constant. They don't use the type ImmutableList because
   * they need to behave slightly differently.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("ConstantCaseForConstants")
  private static final List<Integer> UNDERREPORTING_SIZE_LIST;

  @SuppressWarnings("ConstantCaseForConstants")