### Other (Cleanup or Flake)

- "Removed the ability to run `kubectl exec [POD] [COMMAND]` without a `--` separator.
  The `--` separator has been recommended since the Kubernetes v1.18 release, which also deprecated the legacy way of invoking `kubectl exec`.
  

  Please see [the KEP](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-storage/1710-selinux-relabeling#story-3-cluster-upgrade) how we expect to warn users before any SELinux behavior changes and how they can opt-out before. Note that this field and feature gate is useful only with clusters that run with SELinux enabled. No action is required on clusters without SELinux. ([#127981](htt...

- Sync LB backend nodes for Service `Type=LoadBalancer` on Add/Delete node events. ([#81185](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/81185), [@andrewsykim](https://github.com/andrewsykim))

  - If the custom resource does not participate the spec/status convention, the metadata.generation of the CR increments when there is any change to the CR, except for changes to the metadata.

- The deprecated flag `--lock-object-namespace` and `--lock-object-name` have been removed from kube-scheduler. Please use `--leader-elect-resource-namespace` and `--leader-elect-resource-name` or ComponentConfig instead to configure those parameters. ([#119130](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/119130), [@SataQiu](https://github.com/SataQiu)) [SIG Scheduling]

--allow-privileged parameter of the Kubernetes-worker charm has been set to true based on changes which went into the Kubernetes 1.10 release. Before this change the default value was set to false. If you're installing Canonical Kubernetes you should expect this value to now be true by default and you should now look to use PSP (pod security policies).  ([#64104](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/64104), [@CalvinHartwell](https://github.com/CalvinHartwell))

## External Dependencies...

In short, if you had dependencies that looked like:

```Python
def my_dep():
    try:
        yield
    except SomeException:
        pass
```

Now you need to make sure you raise again after `except`, just as you would in regular Python:

expected := &Nat{[]uint{0}} if x.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", x, expected) } x.Add(y, m) expected = &Nat{[]uint{7}} if x.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", x, expected) } } func TestExp(t *testing.T) { m := modulusFromBytes([]byte{13}) x := &Nat{[]uint{3}} out := &Nat{[]uint{0}} out.Exp(x, []byte{12}, m) expected := &Nat{[]uint{1}} if out.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", out, expected) } } func TestExpShort(t *testing.T) { m := modulusFromBytes([]byte{13}) x...

IPv6, or both, and you can change this setting for existing Services. Details are available in updated [IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack docs](https://docs.k8s.io/concepts/services-networking/dual-stack/), which cover the nuanced array of options.

We expect this implementation to progress from alpha to beta and GA in coming releases, so we’re eager to have you comment about your dual-stack experiences in [#k8s-dual-stack](https://kubernetes.slack.com/messages/k8s-dual-stack) or in [enhancements #563...

expected := &Nat{[]uint{0}} if x.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", x, expected) } x.Add(y, m) expected = &Nat{[]uint{7}} if x.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", x, expected) } } func TestExp(t *testing.T) { m := modulusFromBytes([]byte{13}) x := &Nat{[]uint{3}} out := &Nat{[]uint{0}} out.Exp(x, []byte{12}, m) expected := &Nat{[]uint{1}} if out.Equal(expected) != 1 { t.Errorf("%+v != %+v", out, expected) } } func TestExpShort(t *testing.T) { m := modulusFromBytes([]byte{13}) x...