- github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang: [f33da4d → v0.10.0](https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/compare/f33da4d...v0.10.0)
- github.com/spf13/cobra: [v1.6.0 → v1.7.0](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/compare/v1.6.0...v1.7.0)
- github.com/stretchr/testify: [v1.8.1 → v1.8.2](https://github.com/stretchr/testify/compare/v1.8.1...v1.8.2)

- github.com/gogo/protobuf: [342cbe0 → 65acae2](https://github.com/gogo/protobuf/compare/342cbe0...65acae2)
- github.com/golang/mock: [bd3c8e8 → v1.2.0](https://github.com/golang/mock/compare/bd3c8e8...v1.2.0)
- github.com/golang/protobuf: [v1.2.0 → v1.3.1](https://github.com/golang/protobuf/compare/v1.2.0...v1.3.1)
- github.com/google/btree: [7d79101 → 4030bb1](https://github.com/google/btree/compare/7d79101...4030bb1)

- github.com/google/cel-go: [v0.12.5 → v0.12.6](https://github.com/google/cel-go/compare/v0.12.5...v0.12.6)
- github.com/google/uuid: [v1.1.2 → v1.3.0](https://github.com/google/uuid/compare/v1.1.2...v1.3.0)
- github.com/kr/pretty: [v0.2.1 → v0.3.0](https://github.com/kr/pretty/compare/v0.2.1...v0.3.0)
- github.com/mailru/easyjson: [v0.7.6 → v0.7.7](https://github.com/mailru/easyjson/compare/v0.7.6...v0.7.7)

      // we know ( [
      RangeMapEntry<K, V> rangeMapEntry = mapEntryBelowToTruncate.getValue();
      if (rangeMapEntry.getUpperBound().compareTo(rangeToRemove.lowerBound) > 0) {
        // we know ( [ )
        if (rangeMapEntry.getUpperBound().compareTo(rangeToRemove.upperBound) > 0) {
          // we know ( [ ] ), so insert the range ] ) back into the map --
          // it's being split apart

   * Section 7.2.1.2. The iteration order follows the lexicographical order. This means that the
   * first permutation will be in ascending order, and the last will be in descending order.
   *
   * <p>Elements that compare equal are considered equal and no new permutations are created by
   * swapping them.
   *
   * <p>An empty iterable has only one permutation, which is an empty list.
   *

       *
       * 1. On Android, querying a WeakReference blocks if the GC is doing an otherwise-concurrent
       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *

import java.util.stream.LongStream;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An immutable array of {@code long} values, with an API resembling {@link List}.
 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code long[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).

import java.util.function.IntConsumer;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * An immutable array of {@code int} values, with an API resembling {@link List}.
 *
 * <p>Advantages compared to {@code int[]}:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>All the many well-known advantages of immutability (read <i>Effective Java</i>, third
 *       edition, Item 17).

          E auntElement = elementData(auntIndex);
          if (ordering.compare(auntElement, parentElement) < 0) {
            parentIndex = auntIndex;
            parentElement = auntElement;
          }
        }
      }
      if (ordering.compare(parentElement, x) < 0) {
        queue[index] = parentElement;
        queue[parentIndex] = x;
        return parentIndex;

   * means {@link HashCode#asLong} is guaranteed to return the same value that
   * farmhash::Fingerprint64() would for the same input (when compared using {@link
   * com.google.common.primitives.UnsignedLongs}'s encoding of 64-bit unsigned numbers).
   *
   * <p>This function is best understood as a <a