*
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class AbstractPackageSanityTestsTest extends TestCase {
  /*
   * This is a public type so that the Android test runner can create an instance directly as it
   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests {@code replace(K, V, V)} operations on a concurrent map. Can't
 * be invoked directly; please see {@link
 * com.google.common.collect.testing.ConcurrentMapTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

        String result = updateLabelJob.execute();
        assertNotNull(result);
        assertTrue(result.contains("3 docs"));
        // queryBuilder field is protected, so we can't directly assert it
    }

    // Test execute() method with exception handling
    public void test_execute_withException() {
        // Register a mock that throws exception

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests {@code addAll(int, Collection)} operations on a list. Can't be
 * invoked directly; please see {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.ListTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester for {@link Multimap#containsValue}.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")
// @Ignore affects the Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.
@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class MultimapContainsValueTester<K, V>

👆 💪 📣 `Response` 🔢 🔗, & ⚒ 🍪 (& 🎚) 👫.

## 📨 `Response` 🔗

👆 💪 ✍ 🍪 🕐❔ 🛬 `Response` 🔗 👆 📟.

👈, 👆 💪 ✍ 📨 🔬 [📨 📨 🔗](response-directly.md){.internal-link target=_blank}.

⤴️ ⚒ 🍪 ⚫️, & ⤴️ 📨 ⚫️:

{* ../../docs_src/response_cookies/tutorial001.py hl[10:12] *}

/// tip

✔️ 🤯 👈 🚥 👆 📨 📨 🔗 ↩️ ⚙️ `Response` 🔢, FastAPI 🔜 📨 ⚫️ 🔗.

## Details { #details }

The first `"/static"` refers to the sub-path this "sub-application" will be "mounted" on. So, any path that starts with `"/static"` will be handled by it.

The `directory="static"` refers to the name of the directory that contains your static files.

The `name="static"` gives it a name that can be used internally by **FastAPI**.

import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * A generic JUnit test which tests {@code put} operations on a map. Can't be invoked directly;
 * please see {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.MapTestSuiteBuilder}.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")

    for (int i = 0; i < bytesToCopy; i++) {
      buffer.put(readBuffer.get());
    }
    munch(); // buffer becomes empty here, since chunkSize divides bufferSize

    // Now process directly from the rest of the input buffer
    while (readBuffer.remaining() >= chunkSize) {
      process(readBuffer);
    }

    // Finally stick the remainder back in our usual buffer
    buffer.put(readBuffer);