* {@code view} returned by this method will be invalidated, and will throw {@code
   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw

   * {@code view} returned by this method will be invalidated, and will throw {@code
   * IllegalStateException} if it is accessed in any way, with the following exceptions:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw

		r.AddKnownTypes(admissionv1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion, &admissionv1beta1.AdmissionReview{})
		r.AddKnownTypes(admission.SchemeGroupVersion, &admission.AdmissionReview{})
		return r
	}()
	codecs       = serializer.NewCodecFactory(runtimeScheme)
	deserializer = codecs.UniversalDeserializer()
)

// GetFirstPod returns a pod matching the namespace and label selector
// and the number of all pods that match the label selector.

   *   <li>{@code view.equals(view)} evaluates to {@code true} (but any other {@code equals()}
   *       expression involving {@code view} will throw)
   *   <li>{@code hashCode()} does not throw
   *   <li>if {@code nodeU} or {@code nodeV} are re-added to the network after having been removed,
   *       {@code view}'s behavior is undefined
   * </ul>
   *

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 2. What's the best code you can write to accomplish that without the new feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: 3. What would that same code look like if we added your feature?
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: markdown
    attributes:

                                         TF_AbstractFunction*, TF_Status*);

// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// APIs specific to Eager modes
// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

// Temporary APIs till we figure out how to create scalar valued Eager
// tensors and how to get value out of eager abstract tensors.

  }

  /**
   * Verifies that the {@code Set} returned by {@code nodes} has the expected mutability property
   * (see the {@code Graph} documentation for more information).
   */
  @Test
  public abstract void nodes_checkReturnedSetMutability();

  /**
   * Verifies that the {@code Set} returned by {@code adjacentNodes} has the expected mutability
   * property (see the {@code Graph} documentation for more information).
   */

    /**
     * Adds an edge connecting {@code nodeU} to {@code nodeV} if one is not already present.
     *
     * <p>If the graph is directed, the resultant edge will be directed; otherwise, it will be
     * undirected.
     *
     * <p>If {@code nodeU} and {@code nodeV} are not already present in this graph, this method will
     * silently {@link #addNode(Object) add} {@code nodeU} and {@code nodeV} to the graph.
     *

            parameterOffset += pad;

            totalParameterCount = writeParametersWireFormat( txn_buf, bufParameterOffset );
            bufDataOffset = totalParameterCount; // data comes right after data

            int available = maxBufferSize - parameterOffset;
            parameterCount = Math.min( totalParameterCount, available );
            available -= parameterCount;

@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public interface SuccessorsFunction<N> {

  /**
   * Returns all nodes in this graph adjacent to {@code node} which can be reached by traversing
   * {@code node}'s outgoing edges in the direction (if any) of the edge.
   *
   * <p>This is <i>not</i> the same as "all nodes reachable from {@code node} by following outgoing
   * edges". For that functionality, see {@link Graphs#reachableNodes(Graph, Object)}.
   *