// The actual transport send would need proper integration
        // This would be sent on the NEW channel's transport, not the existing one

        log.debug("Channel binding prepared for channel {} with session 0x{}", channel.getChannelId(), Long.toHexString(getSessionId()));
    }

    /**
     * Shutdown the channel manager
     */
    public void shutdown() {

    /**
     * Reserve an opportunistic lock filter on the open
     */
    public static final int FILE_RESERVE_OPFILTER = 0x100000;
    /**
     * Open a reparse point and bypass normal reparse point processing
     */
    public static final int FILE_OPEN_REPARSE_POINT = 0x200000;
    /**
     * Open does not cause an opportunistic lock break for the file
     */

## Não Separe Schemas

Agora, há alguns casos em que você pode querer ter o **mesmo esquema para entrada e saída**.

     * @param contextPath the context path for the web application
     */
    public FessBoot(final int port, final String contextPath) {
        super(port, contextPath);
    }

    /**
     * Prepares and returns the web application path.
     * Checks for the fess.webapp.path system property first, then falls back to the parent implementation.
     *
     * @return the web application path
     */
    @Override

    int NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED = 0xC0000236;
    /** The pathname does not traverse a DFS junction */
    int NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED = 0xC0000257;
    /** The IO operation on the reparse point failed */
    int NT_STATUS_IO_REPARSE_TAG_NOT_HANDLED = 0xC0000279;
    /** No more files were found matching the file specification */
    int NT_STATUS_NO_MORE_FILES = 0x80000006;

    int NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT = 0xC0000234;
    /** The pathname does not traverse a DFS junction */
    int NT_STATUS_PATH_NOT_COVERED = 0xC0000257;
    /** The IO operation on the reparse point failed */
    int NT_STATUS_IO_REPARSE_TAG_NOT_HANDLED = 0xC0000279;

    /** Array of all NT status codes defined in this interface */

Symmetrically, interceptors can rewrite response headers and transform the response body. This is generally more dangerous than rewriting request headers because it may violate the webserver's expectations!

If you're in a tricky situation and prepared to deal with the consequences, rewriting response headers is a powerful way to work around problems. For example, you can fix a server's misconfigured `Cache-Control` response header to enable better response caching:

```java

    }

    /*
     * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
     * Callers of TestContainerGenerator.order need to be prepared for implementations to return a new
     * collection.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")
    @Override
    public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {

- **XML Processing** (`org.codelibs.core.xml`) - XML DOM utilities, SAX parser helpers, and schema validation support
- **SQL Utilities** (`org.codelibs.core.sql`) - JDBC helper methods for result sets, prepared statements, and connection management
- **Network & I/O** (`org.codelibs.core.net`, `org.codelibs.core.nio`) - URL utilities, UUID generation, MIME type detection, and NIO channel operations

## 🚀 Getting Started

    }

    /*
     * While the current implementation returns `this`, that's not something we mean to guarantee.
     * Callers of TestContainerGenerator.order need to be prepared for implementations to return a new
     * collection.
     */
    @SuppressWarnings("CanIgnoreReturnValueSuggester")
    @Override
    public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {