return asHtml(path_AdminJoblog_AdminJoblogJsp).renderWith(data -> {
            searchPaging(data, form);
        });
    }

    @Execute
    @Secured({ ROLE, ROLE + VIEW })
    public HtmlResponse back(final SearchForm form) {
        saveToken();
        return asHtml(path_AdminJoblog_AdminJoblogJsp).renderWith(data -> {
            searchPaging(data, form);
        });
    }

   * To avoid the need to call requireNonNull so much, we could consider more clever approaches,
   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.

 *       {@code NullPointerTester} would need are not available) and in case of <a
 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.

 *       {@code NullPointerTester} would need are not available) and in case of <a
 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.

 *       {@code NullPointerTester} would need are not available) and in case of <a
 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.

   * To avoid the need to call requireNonNull so much, we could consider more clever approaches,
   * such as:
   *
   * - Make checkOpen return the non-null `seq`. Then callers can assign that to a local variable or
   *   even back to `this.seq`. However, that may suggest that we're defending against concurrent
   *   mutation, which is not an actual risk because we use `synchronized`.

 *       {@code NullPointerTester} would need are not available) and in case of <a
 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.

 *       {@code NullPointerTester} would need are not available) and in case of <a
 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.

    try {
      return Thread.class.getConstructor(
          ThreadGroup.class, Runnable.class, String.class, long.class, boolean.class);
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      // Probably pre Java 9. We'll fall back to Thread.inheritableThreadLocals.
      return null;
    }
  }

	return writeCNIConfig(ctx, marshalledJSON, cfg)
}

// writeCNIConfig will
// 1. read in the existing CNI config file
// 2. append the `istio`-specific entry
// 3. write the combined result back out to the same path, overwriting the original.
func writeCNIConfig(ctx context.Context, pluginConfig []byte, cfg *config.InstallConfig) (string, error) {