/*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (That would also have ensured that its cause was always an Error, rather than possibly another

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (That would also have ensured that its cause was always an Error, rather than possibly another

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

   * even worse. For now, we just suppress and move on with our lives.
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/65
   *
   * - https://github.com/jspecify/jdk/commit/71d826792b8c7ef95d492c50a274deab938f2552
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Is the unchecked cast avoidable? Would System.arraycopy be similarly fast (if

          <item index="14" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="org.jetbrains.annotations.Nullable" />
          <item index="15" class="java.lang.String" itemvalue="org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable" />
        </list>
      </value>
    </option>
    <option name="myNotNulls">
      <value>
        <list size="16">

 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Retention(RUNTIME)

 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Retention(RUNTIME)

 *       href="https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202469">JDK-8202469</a>
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This annotation is a temporary hack. We will remove it after we're able to adopt the <a
 * href="https://jspecify.dev/">JSpecify</a> nullness annotations and <a
 * href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6126#issuecomment-1203145963">tools no longer need
 * it</a>.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Retention(RUNTIME)