///

`WSGIMiddleware`'ı `a2wsgi` paketinden import etmeniz gerekir.

Ardından WSGI (örn. Flask) uygulamasını middleware ile sarmalayın.

Ve sonra bunu bir path'in altına mount edin.

{* ../../docs_src/wsgi/tutorial001_py310.py hl[1,3,23] *}

/// note

Önceden, `fastapi.middleware.wsgi` içindeki `WSGIMiddleware`'ın kullanılması öneriliyordu, ancak artık kullanımdan kaldırıldı.

///

Нужно импортировать `WSGIMiddleware` из `a2wsgi`.

Затем оберните WSGI‑приложение (например, Flask) в middleware (Промежуточный слой).

После этого смонтируйте его на путь.

{* ../../docs_src/wsgi/tutorial001_py310.py hl[1,3,23] *}

/// note | Примечание

Ранее рекомендовалось использовать `WSGIMiddleware` из `fastapi.middleware.wsgi`, но теперь он помечен как устаревший.

///

Você precisa importar o `WSGIMiddleware` de `a2wsgi`.

Em seguida, encapsule a aplicação WSGI (e.g. Flask) com o middleware.

E então monte isso sob um path.

{* ../../docs_src/wsgi/tutorial001_py310.py hl[1,3,23] *}

/// note | Nota

Anteriormente, recomendava-se usar `WSGIMiddleware` de `fastapi.middleware.wsgi`, mas agora está descontinuado.

///

Sie müssen `WSGIMiddleware` aus `a2wsgi` importieren.

Wrappen Sie dann die WSGI-Anwendung (z. B. Flask) mit der Middleware.

Und dann mounten Sie das auf einem Pfad.

{* ../../docs_src/wsgi/tutorial001_py310.py hl[1,3,23] *}

/// note | Hinweis

Früher wurde empfohlen, `WSGIMiddleware` aus `fastapi.middleware.wsgi` zu verwenden, dies ist jetzt deprecatet.

from starlette.middleware.wsgi import (
    WSGIMiddleware as WSGIMiddleware,

* 📝 Use return type annotation instead of `response_model` when possible. PR [#14753](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14753) by [@YuriiMotov](https://github.com/YuriiMotov).
* 📝 Use `WSGIMiddleware` from `a2wsgi` instead of deprecated `fastapi.middleware.wsgi.WSGIMiddleware`. PR [#14756](https://github.com/fastapi/fastapi/pull/14756) by [@YuriiMotov](https://github.com/YuriiMotov).

    * Если Вы сравниваете Uvicorn, сравнивайте его с Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI и т.д. — серверами приложений.
* **Starlette**:

    * Se você quer fazer comparações com o Uvicorn, compare com Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Servidores de Aplicação.
* **Starlette**:
    * Terá a melhor performance, depois do Uvicorn. De fato, Starlette utiliza Uvicorn para rodar. Então, ele provavelmente será "mais lento" que Uvicorn por ter que executar mais código.

    * Si estás comparando Uvicorn, compáralo con Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Servidores de aplicaciones.
* **Starlette**:

    * If you are comparing Uvicorn, compare it against Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Application servers.
* **Starlette**:
    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.