* {@link java.util.Collections#checkedCollection(java.util.Collection, Class)} can suppress it
   * with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-6409434">JDK-6409434</a> is fixed. It's unclear
   * whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix will be to

           * well be a JDK bug.
           */
          || info.getName().contains("TypeTokenTest")
          /*
           * "IllegalAccess tried to access class
           * com.google.common.collect.testing.AbstractIteratorTester from class
           * com.google.common.collect.MultimapsTest"
           *
           * ...when we build with JDK 22 and run under JDK 8.
           */

   * Returns the {@link Method} instance for {@link #testCreateWithNull_unsupported()} so that tests
   * can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-5045147">JDK-5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getCreateWithNullUnsupportedMethod() {

      if (openJSSE != null) {
        return openJSSE
      }
    }

    // An Oracle JDK 9 like OpenJDK, or JDK 8 251+.
    val jdk9 = Jdk9Platform.buildIfSupported()

    if (jdk9 != null) {
      return jdk9
    }

    // An Oracle JDK 8 like OpenJDK, pre 251.
    val jdkWithJettyBoot = Jdk8WithJettyBootPlatform.buildIfSupported()

    if (jdkWithJettyBoot != null) {

    if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/master' || contains(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'containers')

    steps:
      - name: Checkout
        uses: actions/checkout@v6

      - name: Configure JDK
        uses: actions/setup-java@v5
        with:
          distribution: 'zulu'
          java-version: 17

      - name: Setup Gradle
        uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@v5

         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK

    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      /*
       * The subList() docs claim that this should be an
       * IndexOutOfBoundsException, but many JDK implementations throw
       * IllegalArgumentException:
       * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4506427
       */
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types
  public void testSubList_empty() {

    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      /*
       * The subList() docs claim that this should be an
       * IndexOutOfBoundsException, but many JDK implementations throw
       * IllegalArgumentException:
       * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4506427
       */
    }
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("EmptyList") // ImmutableList doesn't support nullable element types
  public void testSubList_empty() {

   * tests can suppress it with {@code FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder.suppressing()} until <a
   * href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-5045147">JDK-5045147</a> is fixed.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getCreateWithNullKeyUnsupportedMethod() {

| Android default  | ✅      | Android 10+  | [BoringSSL]     |                                                              |
| [GraalVM]        | ✅      |              | [OpenJDK]       | Only actively tested with JDK 11, not with 8 target          |
| [Bouncy Castle]  | ✅      |              | [Bouncy Castle] | [Tracking bug.][bug5698]                                     |