// Test fluent API with convenience methods
        RequestData data1 = RequestDataBuilder.newRequestData().get().url("https://example.com/get").weight(1.0f).build();

        assertEquals(Method.GET, data1.getMethod());
        assertEquals("https://example.com/get", data1.getUrl());

        data1 = connection.receive_text()
        assert data1 == "You wrote: Hello from 1234"
        data2 = connection_two.receive_text()
        client1_says = "Client #1234 says: Hello from 1234"
        assert data2 == client1_says
        data1 = connection.receive_text()
        assert data1 == client1_says
        connection_two.close()
        data1 = connection.receive_text()

        // Test that different data produces different results
        byte[] data1 = "data1".getBytes();
        byte[] data2 = "data2".getBytes();

        HMACT64 hmac1 = new HMACT64(TEST_KEY);
        HMACT64 hmac2 = new HMACT64(TEST_KEY);

        hmac1.engineUpdate(data1, 0, data1.length);
        hmac2.engineUpdate(data2, 0, data2.length);

        byte[] result1 = hmac1.engineDigest();

        byte[] data1 = { 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03 };
        assertEquals("00", Hexdump.toHexString(data1, 0, 2)); // 2 chars = 1 byte
        assertEquals("000", Hexdump.toHexString(data1, 0, 3)); // 3 chars = 1.5 bytes (rounds up to 2)
        assertEquals("0001", Hexdump.toHexString(data1, 0, 4)); // 4 chars = 2 bytes
        assertEquals("000102", Hexdump.toHexString(data1, 0, 6)); // 6 chars = 3 bytes

        // produces the same output as the old custom implementation

        // Test case 1: Standard padding
        final byte[] data1 = "abc".getBytes();
        assertEquals("YWJj", Base64Util.encode(data1));

        // Test case 2: Single padding
        final byte[] data2 = "abcd".getBytes();
        assertEquals("YWJjZA==", Base64Util.encode(data2));

        // Create ResponseData in various states
        ResponseData data1 = null;
        ResponseData data2 = new ResponseData();
        ResponseData data3 = new ResponseData();
        data3.setUrl("https://example.com");
        data3.setHttpStatusCode(404);

        // All should complete without error and without modification
        processor.process(data1);
        processor.process(data2);
        processor.process(data3);

    "X-Xss-Protection": "1; mode=block"
  },
  "tags": {
    "objectLocation": {
      "name": "hosts",
      "poolId": 1,
      "setId": 1,
      "drives": [
        "/mnt/data1",
        "/mnt/data2",
        "/mnt/data3",
        "/mnt/data4"
      ]
    }
  },
  "accessKey": "minioadmin"
}
```

### Kafka Target

    /**
     * Test that validateInputStream is consistent across multiple calls.
     */
    public void test_validateInputStream_consistentAcrossMultipleCalls() {
        final InputStream in1 = new ByteArrayInputStream("data1".getBytes());
        final InputStream in2 = new ByteArrayInputStream("data2".getBytes());

        // First call
        extractor.testValidateInputStream(in1);

        // Second call with different stream

    val headers1 = peer.takeFrame()
    assertThat(headers1.type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_HEADERS)
    val data1 = peer.takeFrame()
    assertThat(data1.type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_DATA)
    assertThat(data1.streamId).isEqualTo(3)
    assertArrayEquals("abcdefghi".toByteArray(), data1.data)
    assertThat(data1.inFinished).isFalse()
    val headers2 = peer.takeFrame()
    assertThat(headers2.type).isEqualTo(Http2.TYPE_HEADERS)

		err   error  // Expected error outcome
	}{
		{"", 0, io.EOF}, // Empty file is a "valid" tar file
		{data1[:511], 0, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data1[:512], 1, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data1[:1024], 1, io.EOF},
		{data1[:1536], 2, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data1[:2048], 2, io.EOF},
		{data1, 2, io.EOF},
		{data1[:2048] + data2[:1536], 3, io.EOF},
		{data2[:511], 0, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},
		{data2[:512], 1, io.ErrUnexpectedEOF},