AssertObjEqual(t, newUser, user, "ID", "CreatedAt", "UpdatedAt", "DeletedAt", "Name", "Age", "Birthday",
				"CompanyID", "ManagerID", "Active")
		}
	}

	AssertObjEqual(t, user, expect, "ID", "CreatedAt", "UpdatedAt", "DeletedAt", "Name", "Age", "Birthday", "CompanyID",
		"ManagerID", "Active")

	t.Run("Account", func(t *testing.T) {

     * from the collection obtained by {@link #getModelIds()}. As a special case, an empty string can be used as the
     * identifier for the super POM.
     *
     * @param modelId The identifier of the model whose active profiles should be retrieved, must not be {@code null}.

    }

    /**
     * Gets the active profiles from the model.
     *
     * @return The active profiles or {@code null} if not set.
     */
    public List<Profile> getActiveProfiles() {
        return activeProfiles;
    }

    /**
     * Sets the active profiles from the model.
     *
     * @param activeProfiles The active profiles, may be {@code null}.
     */

│ ID  │ Pools                           │ Capacity                         │ Status │
│ 1st │ http://minio{1...2}/data{1...4} │ 439 GiB (used) / 561 GiB (total) │ Active │
│ 2nd │ http://minio{3...4}/data{1...4} │ 329 GiB (used) / 421 GiB (total) │ Active │
└─────┴─────────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────────┴────────┘
```

### Decommissioning status

```

        SimpleProblemCollector problems = new SimpleProblemCollector();
        List<Profile> active = selector.getActiveProfiles(profiles, context, problems);
        assertTrue(
                active.isEmpty(), "Expected collection to be empty but had " + active.size() + " elements: " + active);
        assertEquals(1, problems.getErrors().size());
        assertEquals(

question - i.e with `mc stat --version-id dm-version-id`

It must be noted that if active-active replication is set up with delete marker replication, there is potential for duplicate delete markers to be created if both source and target concurrently set a Delete Marker or if one/both of the clusters went down at tandem before the replication event was synced.This is an unavoidable side-effect in active-active replication caused by allowing delete markers set on a object version with `REPLICA`...

/**
 * Calculates the active profiles among a given collection of profiles.
 *
 * @deprecated use {@code org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")
public interface ProfileSelector {

    /**
     * Determines the profiles which are active in the specified activation context. Active profiles will eventually be
     * injected into the model.
     *

				Values:  [][]interface{}{{99.5}},
			},
		},
		{
			name: "Test convert bool value",
			input: map[string]interface{}{
				"active": true,
			},
			expect: clause.Values{
				Columns: []clause.Column{{Name: "active"}},
				Values:  [][]interface{}{{true}},
			},
		},
	}

	for _, tc := range testCase {
		t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {

    }

    public List<ArtifactRepository> getRemoteRepositories() {
        return remoteRepositories;
    }

    public boolean isActive() {
        return active;
    }

    public void enable() {
        active = true;

        // TODO if it was null, we really need to go find them now... or is this taken care of by the ordering?
        if (children != null) {

            seen = true;

            tg = aTgList;
            Thread[] ts = new Thread[tg.activeCount()];
            tg.enumerate(ts);

            for (Thread active : ts) {
                String name = active.getName();
                boolean daemon = active.isDaemon();
                assertTrue(daemon, name + " is no daemon Thread.");
            }
        }