"2.1 OK"
"2.10 OK"
"2.11 OK"
"2.2 OK"
"2.3 OK"
"2.4 OK"
"2.5 OK"
"2.6 OK"
"2.7 OK"
"2.8 OK"
"2.9 OK"
"3.1 OK"
"3.2 NON-STRICT"
"3.3 NON-STRICT"
"3.4 NON-STRICT"
"3.5 OK"
"3.6 OK"
"3.7 OK"
"4.1.1 OK"
"4.1.2 OK"
"4.1.3 NON-STRICT"
"4.1.4 NON-STRICT"
"4.1.5 OK"
"4.2.1 OK"
"4.2.2 OK"
"4.2.3 NON-STRICT"
"4.2.4 OK"
"4.2.5 OK"
"5.1 OK"
"5.10 OK"

        writeLittleEndianInt(baos, 10); // size
        writeLittleEndianLong(baos, 25); // Unaligned offset (not multiple of 8)
        // Add enough data to avoid array bounds issues
        while (baos.size() < 35) {
            baos.write(0);
        }
        byte[] pacData = baos.toByteArray();

        PACDecodingException e = assertThrows(PACDecodingException.class, () -> new Pac(pacData, keys));

        // Verify data offset (4 bytes at position 31)
        assertEquals(130, SMBUtil.readInt4(dst, 31));

        // Verify setup count
        assertEquals(1, dst[35]);

        // Verify function (2 bytes at position 36)
        assertEquals(SmbComNtTransaction.NT_TRANSACT_QUERY_SECURITY_DESC, SMBUtil.readInt2(dst, 36));
    }

    @Test

            (byte) 49, (byte) 41, (byte) 33, (byte) 25, (byte) 17, (byte) 9, (byte) 1, (byte) 58, (byte) 50, (byte) 42, (byte) 34,
            (byte) 26, (byte) 18, (byte) 10, (byte) 2, (byte) 59, (byte) 51, (byte) 43, (byte) 35, (byte) 62, (byte) 54, (byte) 46,
            (byte) 38, (byte) 30, (byte) 22, (byte) 14, (byte) 6, (byte) 61, (byte) 53, (byte) 45, (byte) 37, (byte) 29, (byte) 21,

// along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package cmd

import (
	"runtime"
	"testing"
	"time"
)

// WARNING:
//
// Expected source line number is hard coded, 35, in the
// following test. Adding new code before this test or changing its
// position will cause the line number to change and the test to FAIL
// Tests getSource().
func TestGetSource(t *testing.T) {

 *
 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

        // Entry 2: IPC$, type 3 (IPC), remark "Inter-Process Communication"
        System.arraycopy("IPC$".getBytes(StandardCharsets.US_ASCII), 0, data, 20, 4);
        data[34] = 0x03;
        data[35] = 0x00; // type = 3
        data[36] = 60;
        data[37] = 0;
        data[38] = 0;
        data[39] = 0; // remark offset

        // Remarks data

Por ejemplo, el modelo anterior declara un “`object`” JSON (o `dict` en Python) como:

```JSON
{
    "name": "Foo",
    "description": "An optional description",
    "price": 45.2,
    "tax": 3.5
}
```

...dado que `description` y `tax` son opcionales (con un valor por defecto de `None`), este “`object`” JSON también sería válido:

```JSON
{
    "name": "Foo",
    "price": 45.2
}
```

        String name2 = "DOMAIN          ";
        System.arraycopy(name2.getBytes("US-ASCII"), 0, src, srcIndex + 19, 16);
        src[srcIndex + 34] = 0x00; // hex code
        src[srcIndex + 35] = (byte) 0x84; // flags: group, active

        // Third name entry (18 bytes) - matching queryAddress
        String name3 = "TEST            ";
        System.arraycopy(name3.getBytes("US-ASCII"), 0, src, srcIndex + 37, 16);

		//    * Listing an object with a trailing slash and '/' delimiter
		34: {
			IsTruncated: false,
			Objects:     []ObjectInfo{},
		},
		// ListObjectsResult-35 list with custom uncommon delimiter
		35: {
			IsTruncated: false,
			Objects: []ObjectInfo{
				{Name: "file1/receipt.json"},
			},
			Prefixes: []string{"file1/guidSplunk"},
		},