if (prefix != nullptr && !absl::StartsWith(n->name(), prefix_cmp)) {
        status->status = tensorflow::errors::Internal(
            "BUG: The gradients prefix have been unexpectedly altered when "
            "adding the nodes to the graph. This is a bug. Please file an "
            "issue at https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues.");
        return;
      }

        this.useNTSmbs = th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_NT_SMBS);
        if (!this.useNTSmbs) {
            log.debug("No support for NT SMBs");
        }

        // there seems to be a bug with some servers that causes corruption if using signatures +
        // CAP_LARGE_WRITE
        if (th.hasCapability(SmbConstants.CAP_LARGE_WRITEX) && !th.areSignaturesActive()) {

  }

  public void testBuilder_presize_negative() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableDoubleArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {

Varias veces ha sucedido que hay PRs con 3, 5 o más aprobaciones, probablemente porque la descripción es atractiva, pero cuando reviso los PRs, en realidad están rotos, tienen un bug, o no resuelven el problema que dicen resolver. 😅

Así que, es realmente importante que realmente leas y ejecutes el código, y me hagas saber en los comentarios que lo hiciste. 🤓

///

    // This is somewhat annoying, but turns out to be very fast in practice. Alternatively, we could
    // drop the contract on the method that enforces this queue like behavior since depending on it
    // is likely to be a bug anyway.

    // N.B. All writes to the list and the next pointers must have happened before the above
    // synchronized block, so we can iterate the list without the lock held here.

            // Test parent of a server
            assertEquals("smb1://", new SmbFile("smb1://server/").getParent());
            // Test parent of root - currently throws NPE due to bug in SmbFile.getParent()
            // when authority is null. This is a known issue in the legacy implementation.
            // For now, we expect the NPE to maintain backward compatibility

   *    permit retries.)
   *  * If OkHttp already attempted to transmit the request body, and [RequestBody.isOneShot] is
   *    true.
   *
   * It won't retry if the exception is a bug or a configuration problem, such as:
   *
   *  * If the remote peer is untrusted: [exception] is an [SSLPeerUnverifiedException].
   *  * If received data is unexpected: [exception] is a [ProtocolException].
   *

sleep 30

./mc ls -r --versions minio1/newbucket >/tmp/minio1.txt
./mc ls -r --versions minio2/newbucket >/tmp/minio2.txt

out=$(diff -qpruN /tmp/minio1.txt /tmp/minio2.txt)
ret=$?
if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "BUG: expected no missing entries after replication resync: $out"
	exit 1
fi

    // backward map ordered by country (even for currency values)
    assertThat(bimap.inverse().values()).containsExactly(Currency.DOLLAR, Currency.PESO).inOrder();
  }

  public void testEntrySet() {
    // Bug 3168290
    Map<Currency, Country> map =
        ImmutableMap.of(
            Currency.DOLLAR, Country.CANADA,
            Currency.PESO, Country.CHILE,
            Currency.FRANC, Country.SWITZERLAND);

            int encodedSize = context.encode(buffer, 0);

            // Assert
            // Note: size() returns 4 + (2*ciphers.length) but encode only writes 2 + (2*ciphers.length)
            // This appears to be a bug in the implementation, but we test the actual behavior
            assertEquals(6, encodedSize); // actual encoded size: 2 bytes count + 2*2 bytes for ciphers
            assertEquals(2, buffer[0]); // cipher count (little endian)