]:0===c.indexOf("max")&&b>e?["max",e]:["ok"]},_numSuggestionElements:0,_selectedSuggestion:null,_previousTypedVal:null,suggest:function(b,d,e){var f={css:{maxHeight:"150px",background:"#FFF",lineHeight:"150%",textDecoration:"underline",overflowX:"hidden",overflowY:"auto",border:"#CCC solid 1px",borderTop:"none",cursor:"pointer"},activeSuggestionCSS:{background:"#E9E9E9"}},g=function(a,b){var c=b.offset();a.css({width:b.outerWidth(),left:c.left+"px",top:c.top+b.outerHeight()+"px"})};e&&a.extend(f...

0.075);\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 575.98px) {\n  .table-responsive-sm {\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    overflow-x: auto;\n    -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\n  }\n  .table-responsive-sm > .table-bordered {\n    border: 0;\n  }\n}\n\n@media (max-width: 767.98px) {\n  .table-responsive-md {\n    display: block;\n    width: 100%;\n    overflow-x: auto;\n    -webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch;\n  }\n  .table-responsive-md > .table-bordered {\n    border: 0;\n  }\n}\n\n@media (max-width:...

discard high bits upon overflow, and programs may rely on "wrap around".
</p>

<p>
For signed integers, the operations <code>+</code>,
<code>-</code>, <code>*</code>, <code>/</code>, and <code>&lt;&lt;</code> may legally
overflow and the resulting value exists and is deterministically defined
by the signed integer representation, the operation, and its operands.

        ExecutionEvent event = mock(ExecutionEvent.class);
        MavenProject project = mock(MavenProject.class);
        when(project.getGroupId()).thenReturn("org.apache.maven.plugins.overflow");
        when(project.getArtifactId()).thenReturn("maven-project-info-reports-plugin");
        when(project.getPackaging()).thenReturn("maven-plugin");

      setFutureSuccess.set(false);
      cancellationSuccess.set(false);
      finalResults.clear();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

  // In a previous implementation this would cause a stack overflow after ~2000 futures chained
  // together.  Now it should only be limited by available memory (and time)
  public void testSetFuture_stackOverflow() {
    SettableFuture<String> orig = SettableFuture.create();

ut-fixed")&&("undefined"!=typeof n.default.fn.overlayScrollbars?n.default(Le).overlayScrollbars({className:this._config.scrollbarTheme,sizeAutoCapable:!0,scrollbars:{autoHide:this._config.scrollbarAutoHide,clickScrolling:!0}}):n.default(Le).css("overflow-y","auto"))},t.fixLoginRegisterHeight=function(){var e=n.default("body"),t=n.default(".login-box, .register-box");if(e.hasClass("iframe-mode"))e.css("height","100%"),n.default(".wrapper").css("height","100%"),n.default("html").css("height","100%");else...

      int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }
      int hash = 1;
      for (Set<E> axis : axes) {
        hash = 31 * hash + (size() / axis.size() * axis.hashCode());

        hash = ~~hash;
      }
      hash += adjust;

   *       tasks -- even tasks that are not themselves {@code directExecutor} tasks.
   *   <li>If many such tasks are chained together (such as with {@code
   *       future.transform(...).transform(...).transform(...)....}), they may overflow the stack.
   *       (In simple cases, callers can avoid this by registering all tasks with the same {@link
   *       MoreExecutors#newSequentialExecutor} wrapper around {@code directExecutor()}. More

(max-width:575.98px){.table-responsive-sm{display:block;width:100%;overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.table-responsive-sm>.table-bordered{border:0}}@media (max-width:767.98px){.table-responsive-md{display:block;width:100%;overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.table-responsive-md>.table-bordered{border:0}}@media (max-width:991.98px){.table-responsive-lg{display:block;width:100%;overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}.table-responsive-lg>.table-bordered{border:0}}@media...

   * threads take special action by participating in the signal-passing game.
   */

  /*
   * Timeout handling is intricate, especially given our ambitious goals:
   * - Avoid underflow and overflow of timeout values when specified timeouts are close to
   *   Long.MIN_VALUE or Long.MAX_VALUE.
   * - Favor responding to interrupts over timeouts.