In this case, it would be better to get **one extra server** and run some processes on it so that they all have **enough RAM and CPU time**.

            auth1.equals(auth2);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test that password comparison is constant-time by comparing execution times
     * for passwords that differ at different positions.
     */
    @Test
    public void testConstantTimePasswordComparison() throws Exception {

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertTrue;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyString;
import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.eq;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.doThrow;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.DisplayName;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

package jcifs.dcerpc;

import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.doThrow;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify;

import org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations;

import jcifs.dcerpc.ndr.NdrBuffer;

class DcerpcSecurityProviderTest {

    @Mock

        };

        for (long[] times : timeValues) {
            // Given
            FileBasicInfo info = new FileBasicInfo(times[0], // create time
                    times[1], // last access time
                    times[2], // last write time
                    times[3], // change time
                    TEST_ATTRIBUTES);

      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead
      // to a confusing error message.
      throw new TimeoutException("Timed out waiting for " + this + " to reach the RUNNING state.");
    }
  }

  @Override

        verify(transport, times(1)).acquire();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("close/release manage usage and transport lifecycle")
    void testReleaseLifecycle() {
        SmbSessionImpl session = newSession();

        // First release drops usage to zero and releases transport
        session.release();
        verify(transport, times(1)).release();
        assertFalse(session.isInUse());

          response: Response?,
        ) {
          t.printStackTrace(System.out)
          latch.countDown()
        }
      },
    )

    check(latch.await(30, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) { "Timed out waiting for test $number to finish." }
    val endNanos = System.nanoTime()
    val tookMs = TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(endNanos - startNanos.get())
    println("Took ${tookMs}ms")
  }

        assertTrue(transport.isSMB2());
        assertFalse(transport.isSMB2());
        verify(transport, times(2)).isSMB2();

        doThrow(new SmbException("query failed")).when(transport).isSMB2();
        assertThrows(SmbException.class, () -> transport.isSMB2());
        verify(transport, times(3)).isSMB2();
    }

    // Inflight requests count including edge values
    @ParameterizedTest

        // Verify that server-side path engaged at least the initial opens
        verify(src, times(1)).openUnshared(anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt());
        verify(dest, times(1)).openUnshared(anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt(), anyInt());
    }

    // --- WriterThread behavior ---

    @Test