SmbRenewableCredentials impl = supplier.get();

        // Act: call renew
        CredentialsInternal renewed = impl.renew();

        // Assert: verify behavior based on scenario
        if (expectSame) {
            assertSame(impl, renewed, "renew() should return the same instance");
        } else if (expectNew) {
            assertNotNull(renewed, "renew() should return a new non-null instance");

	for _, mount := range mts {
		// Add a separator to indicate that this is a proper mount-point.
		// This is to avoid a situation where prefix is '/tmp/fsmount'
		// and mount path is /tmp/fs. In such a scenario we need to check for
		// `/tmp/fs/` to be a common prefix amount other mounts.
		mpath := strings.TrimSuffix(mount.Path, "/") + "/"
		ppath := strings.TrimSuffix(path, "/") + "/"
		if strings.HasPrefix(mpath, ppath) {

      required: false

  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        #### Ubiquity: provide concrete use cases


        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case

     * AggregateFutureState.
     *
     * Here, we check that we're able to force AbstractFutureState to select SynchronizedHelper, and
     * below, we actually run the AbstractFutureTest methods under that scenario.
     */
    checkHelperVersion(NO_ATOMIC_REFERENCE_FIELD_UPDATER, "SynchronizedHelper");

    // Then, run the actual tests under each alternative classloader:

    /*

        // Initial update - should mark as changed
        entry.updateChild(childName, 1024L, 1000L, false, 0x20, 500L, 800L);
        assertTrue(entry.hasChanges());

        // Clear changes to test next scenario
        entry.markComplete();
        assertFalse(entry.hasChanges());

        // Update with same values - should not mark as changed (no actual change)

En un escenario avanzado donde sabes que necesitas que la dependencia se llame en cada paso (posiblemente varias veces) en el mismo request en lugar de usar el valor "en caché", puedes establecer el parámetro `use_cache=False` al usar `Depends`:

## Riesgo de CSRF { #csrf-risk }

Este comportamiento por defecto provee protección contra una clase de ataques de **Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)** en un escenario muy específico.

Estos ataques aprovechan que los navegadores permiten que los scripts envíen requests sin hacer un preflight de CORS cuando:

* no tienen un header `Content-Type` (p. ej. usando `fetch()` con un body `Blob`)

erneut zu berechnen.">„Cache“</dfn> und übergibt diesen gecachten Wert an alle „Dependanten“, die ihn in diesem spezifischen Request benötigen, anstatt die Abhängigkeit mehrmals für denselben Request aufzurufen.

In einem fortgeschrittenen Szenario, bei dem Sie wissen, dass die Abhängigkeit bei jedem Schritt (möglicherweise mehrmals) in demselben Request aufgerufen werden muss, anstatt den zwischengespeicherten Wert zu verwenden, können Sie den Parameter `use_cache=False` festlegen, wenn Sie...

            assertNotNull(results);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Test handling of very slow searcher (simulates timeout scenario).
     */
    @Test
    public void test_slowSearcher() throws Exception {
        try (RankFusionProcessor processor = new RankFusionProcessor()) {
            processor.setSearcher(new TestSearcher(100));

//
// Some types of a queries are not valid. For example, an aggregation
// function combined with a row function is meaningless ("AVG(s.Age) +
// s.Salary"). Analysis determines if such a scenario exists so an
// error can be returned.

var (
	// Fatal error for query processing.
	errNestedAggregation      = errors.New("Cannot nest aggregations")