for (Annotation a : classOrMethod.getDeclaredAnnotations()) {
          /*
           * We avoid reflecting on NullMarked because its @Target(..., MODULE) causes problems
           * under JDK 8.
           */
          if (!(a instanceof NullMarked)
              && a.annotationType().isAnnotationPresent(TesterAnnotation.class)) {
            annotations.add(a);
          }
        }

  private static final byte[] ARRAY234 = {(byte) 2, (byte) 3, (byte) 4};

  private static final byte[] VALUES = {Byte.MIN_VALUE, -1, 0, 1, Byte.MAX_VALUE};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (byte value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Bytes.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Byte.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

   * typically by writing {@code (Function<Object, String> & Serializable) Object::toString}.
   *
   * <p>For more important information about the transition from Guava's {@link Function} class to
   * the JDK {@link java.util.function.Function} class, see {@link Function}.
   */
  public static Function<Object, String> toStringFunction() {
    return ToStringFunction.INSTANCE;
  }

  // enum singleton pattern

 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user
 * specified the JVM flag {@code -XX:+DisableExplicitGC}. But in practice, it works very well for
 * ordinary tests.
 *

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

  private static final int GREATEST = Integer.MAX_VALUE;

  private static final int[] VALUES = {LEAST, (int) -1, (int) 0, (int) 1, GREATEST};

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (int value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Ints.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Integer.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

        Long.MIN_VALUE,
        Long.MAX_VALUE
      };

  private static final float[] VALUES = Floats.concat(NUMBERS, new float[] {NaN});

  // We need to test that our method behaves like the JDK method.
  @SuppressWarnings("InlineMeInliner")
  public void testHashCode() {
    for (float value : VALUES) {
      assertThat(Floats.hashCode(value)).isEqualTo(Float.hashCode(value));
    }
  }

      return Types.toString(type);
    }

    boolean jdkTypeDuplicatesOwnerName() {
      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects

      return Types.toString(type);
    }

    boolean jdkTypeDuplicatesOwnerName() {
      return true;
    }
  }

  /**
   * Per <a href="https://github.com/google/guava/issues/1635">issue 1635</a>, In JDK 1.7.0_51-b13,
   * {@link TypeVariableImpl#equals(Object)} is changed to no longer be equal to custom TypeVariable
   * implementations. As a result, we need to make sure our TypeVariable implementation respects

  }

  /*
   * TODO: b/381289911 - Make the Iterator overload use StringJoiner (including Android or not)—or
   * some other optimization, given that StringJoiner can over-allocate:
   * https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305774
   */

  // TODO: b/381289911 - Optimize MapJoiner similarly to Joiner (including Android or not).

  /**
   * Returns a string containing the string representation of each of {@code parts}, using the