* unique within a single POM. Upon multiple declarations, 2.x just kept the last one but retained the order of
         * the first occurrence. So when we're in lenient/compat mode, we have to deal with such broken POMs and mimic
         * the way 2.x works. When we're in strict mode, the removal of duplicates just saves other merging steps from
         * aftereffects and bogus error messages.
         */

    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {
        "size": 30,
        "content": {
            "name": "Maaaagic",
            "price": 42,
            "description": "Just kiddin', no magic here. ✨",
        },
    }


def test_openapi_schema():
    response = client.get("/openapi.json")
    assert response.status_code == 200, response.text
    assert response.json() == {

        boolean matched = false;
        for (Iterator<String> i = patterns.iterator(); i.hasNext() & !matched; ) {
            // TODO what about wildcards? Just specifying groups? versions?
            if (id.equals(i.next())) {
                matched = true;
            }
        }
        return matched;
    }

    public List<String> getPatterns() {

		return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to remove unix://%s: %v", path, err)
	}

	// Attempt to create the folder in case it doesn't exist
	if err := os.MkdirAll(filepath.Dir(path), 0o750); err != nil {
		// If we cannot create it, just warn here - we will fail later if there is a real error
		log.Warnf("Failed to create directory for %v: %v", path, err)
	}

	var err error
	listener, err := net.Listen("unix", path)
	if err != nil {

 * overriding going on amongst the models being used in this test:
 * each model in the lineage is providing a value that is not present
 * anywhere else in the lineage. We are just making sure that values
 * down in the lineage are bubbling up where they should.
 *
 */
@Deprecated
class ProjectInheritanceTest extends AbstractProjectInheritanceTestCase {

Or it might be the case that you just prefer to take other courses because they adapt better to your learning style.

        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just
        forking Guava yourself.


        We want to see that new features have some significant advantage over the alternatives.
        These advantages can take

 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception
 * varies; see its documentation for details.) Use it just like a {@code TearDown}, except override
 * {@link #sloppyTearDown()} instead.
 *
 * @author Luiz-Otavio Zorzella
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

    assertBasicUrlEscaper(e);

    /*
     * Specified as safe by RFC 2396 but not by java.net.URLEncoder. These tests will start failing
     * when the escaper is made compliant with RFC 2396, but that's a good thing (just change them
     * to assertUnescaped).
     */
    assertEscaping(e, "%21", '!');
    assertEscaping(e, "%28", '(');
    assertEscaping(e, "%29", ')');
    assertEscaping(e, "%7E", '~');

       for the change (usually before you start working on it).  Trivial changes like typos do not
       require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
       pulling in other changes.
 - [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
 - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY`,