* next} field is lazily initialized. The type of that field would be {@code @Nullable T}, and the
   * code would be responsible for populating a "real" {@code T} (which might still be the value
   * {@code null}!) before returning it to callers. Depending on how the code is structured, a
   * nullness analysis might not understand that the field has been populated. To avoid that problem

                return false;
            }
        });
        sambaHelper.init();

        // Verify method signature exists for SMB1 SID - actual test would require real SMB1 SID instance
        assertNotNull(sambaHelper);
    }

    public void test_createSearchRole_lowercase() {
        ComponentUtil.setFessConfig(new FessConfig.SimpleImpl() {
            @Override

import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.concurrent.LazyInit;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * The representation of a linear transformation between real numbers {@code x} and {@code y}.
 * Graphically, this is the specification of a straight line on a plane. The transformation can be
 * expressed as {@code y = m * x + c} for finite {@code m} and {@code c}, unless it is a vertical

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;

import jcifs.dcerpc.rpc;
import jcifs.dcerpc.ndr.NdrBuffer;
import jcifs.dcerpc.ndr.NdrException;

/**
 * Integration tests for lsarpc classes using real NdrBuffer implementations
 */
class lsarpcIntegrationTest {

    @Test
    void testLsarDomainInfoEncodeDecodeRoundTrip() throws NdrException {
        // Create a domain info with test data

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("renew: invokes getSubject and returns self")
    void testRenewInvokesGetSubjectAndReturnsSelf() {
        JAASAuthenticator auth = spy(new JAASAuthenticator());
        // Avoid real JAAS by stubbing getSubject
        doReturn(new Subject()).when(auth).getSubject();

        // Act
        CredentialsInternal result = auth.renew();

        // Assert interaction and return value

    @Test
    void testSend() throws SmbException {
        SmbTree tree = new SmbTree(session, "testShare", "A:");
        tree.connectionState = 2; // Connected state
        tree.tid = 123;

        // Create real request and response objects since they're not interfaces
        ServerMessageBlock request = new SmbComOpenAndX("testfile.txt", 0x01, 0, null);
        ServerMessageBlock response = new SmbComOpenAndXResponse();

tener **un programa/servidor HTTP** ejecutándose en el servidor (la máquina, host, etc.) y **gestionando todas las partes de HTTPS**: recibiendo los **requests HTTPS encriptados**, enviando los **requests HTTP desencriptados** a la aplicación HTTP real que se ejecuta en el mismo servidor (la aplicación **FastAPI**, en este caso), tomando el **response HTTP** de la aplicación, **encriptándolo** usando el **certificado HTTPS** adecuado y enviándolo de vuelta al cliente usando **HTTPS**. Este servidor...

import jcifs.smb.SmbSessionInternal;
import jcifs.smb.SmbTransportInternal;

/**
 * Unit tests for SMB3 Multi-Channel functionality
 *
 * These tests verify the multi-channel implementation without requiring a real SMB server.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
@MockitoSettings(strictness = Strictness.LENIENT)
class MultiChannelIntegrationTest {

    @Mock
    private SmbTransportInternal mockTransport;

    @Mock

            fail("Failed to access servername field: " + e.getMessage());
        }
    }

    @Test
    void testGetEntriesWithMultipleShares() throws Exception {
        // Create real ShareInfo1 objects instead of mocks
        srvsvc.ShareInfo1 shareInfo1 = new srvsvc.ShareInfo1();
        shareInfo1.netname = "Share1";
        shareInfo1.type = 0;
        shareInfo1.remark = "Remark for Share1";

         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {