wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: AllocationResult: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: AllocationResult: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 2 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field ResourceHandles", wireType)
			}

		wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ExampleRequest: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ExampleRequest: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 2 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field Request", wireType)
			}
			var stringLen uint64

	/* 1 */ {_SigNotify + _SigKill, "SIGHUP: hangup"},
	/* 2 */ {_SigNotify + _SigKill, "SIGINT: interrupt (rubout)"},
	/* 3 */ {_SigNotify + _SigThrow, "SIGQUIT: quit (ASCII FS)"},
	/* 4 */ {_SigThrow + _SigUnblock, "SIGILL: illegal instruction (not reset when caught)"},
	/* 5 */ {_SigThrow + _SigUnblock, "SIGTRAP: trace trap (not reset when caught)"},
	/* 6 */ {_SigNotify + _SigThrow, "SIGABRT: used by abort, replace SIGIOT in the future"},

Because those implementations live at different GAV coordinates, the build tool has usually no way to find out that there's a conflict between those libraries.
To solve this, Gradle provides the concept of _capability_.

It's illegal to find two components providing the same _capability_ in a single dependency graph.

		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ExemptPriorityLevelConfiguration: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ExemptPriorityLevelConfiguration: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 0 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field NominalConcurrencyShares", wireType)
			}

		wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: SelfSubjectReview: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: SelfSubjectReview: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 2 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field ObjectMeta", wireType)
			}
			var msglen int

		wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ControllerRevision: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ControllerRevision: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 2 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field ObjectMeta", wireType)
			}
			var msglen int

		wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: IntOrString: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: IntOrString: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 0 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field Type", wireType)
			}
			m.Type = 0

     */
    @SuppressWarnings("static-access")
    @Test
    public void testFormat() {
        exception.expect(ClIllegalArgumentException.class);
        exception.expectMessage(is("[ECL0009]argument[AUTL0009] is illegal. because messageCode : AUTL0009."));
        Logger.format("AUTL0009", "hoge");
    }

		wireType := int(wire & 0x7)
		if wireType == 4 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ControllerRevision: wiretype end group for non-group")
		}
		if fieldNum <= 0 {
			return fmt.Errorf("proto: ControllerRevision: illegal tag %d (wire type %d)", fieldNum, wire)
		}
		switch fieldNum {
		case 1:
			if wireType != 2 {
				return fmt.Errorf("proto: wrong wireType = %d for field ObjectMeta", wireType)
			}
			var msglen int