r.Close()
		if err == nil {
			break
		}
	}
}

func (m *mrfState) startMRFPersistence() {
	loadMRF := func(rc io.ReadCloser, opCh chan PartialOperation) error {
		defer rc.Close()
		var data [4]byte
		n, err := rc.Read(data[:])
		if err != nil {
			return err
		}
		if n != len(data) {
			return errors.New("heal mrf: no data")
		}

  /** True if there was an exception on the connection to the peer. */
  internal var hasFailure: Boolean = false
    private set

  internal val connection: RealConnection
    get() = codec.carrier as? RealConnection ?: error("no connection for CONNECT tunnels")

  internal val isCoalescedConnection: Boolean
    get() = finder.routePlanner.address.url.host != codec.carrier.route.address.url.host

  @Throws(IOException::class)

```Python
some_variable: PlaneItem | CarItem
```

Pero si ponemos eso en la asignación `response_model=PlaneItem | CarItem` obtendríamos un error, porque Python intentaría realizar una **operación inválida** entre `PlaneItem` y `CarItem` en lugar de interpretar eso como una anotación de tipo.

## Lista de modelos

        run: |
          container_name=$(docker ps --filter "ancestor=opengauss/opengauss:7.0.0-RC1.B023" --format "{{.Names}}")
          if [ -z "$container_name" ]; then
            echo "Error: failed to find a container created from the 'opengauss/opengauss:7.0.0-RC1.B023' image."
            exit 1
          fi
          max_retries=12
          retry_count=0
          if [ -t 0 ]; then

		}
	}()
	for _, context := range contexts {
		w := NewWalker(context, "testdata/src/issue64958")
		pkg, err := w.importFrom("p", "", 0)
		if err != nil {
			t.Errorf("expected no error importing; got %T", err)
		}
		w.export(pkg)
	}
}

func TestCheck(t *testing.T) {
	if !*flagCheck {
		t.Skip("-check not specified")
	}
	testenv.MustHaveGoBuild(t)
	Check(t)

     *
     * @param accessResultData the data containing the XML content to be parsed
     * @return a map containing the parsed data from the XML content
     * @throws CrawlerSystemException if an error occurs while parsing the XML content
     */
    public static Map<String, Object> getDataMap(final AccessResultData<?> accessResultData) {
        // create input source

    val errorCodeInt = source.readInt()
    val errorCode =
      ErrorCode.fromHttp2(errorCodeInt) ?: throw IOException(
        "TYPE_RST_STREAM unexpected error code: $errorCodeInt",
      )
    handler.rstStream(streamId, errorCode)
  }

  @Throws(IOException::class)
  private fun readSettings(
    handler: Handler,
    length: Int,
    flags: Int,

                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,

                   prod code. It's disabled automatically for "test code"
                   (which is good: our tests have intentional violations), but
                   Error Prone doesn't know it's building test code unless we
                   pass -XepCompilingTestOnlyCode, and that argument needs to
                   be passed as part of the same <arg> as -Xplugin:ErrorProne,

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial008c_an_py39.py hl[15:16] *}

Neste caso, o cliente irá ver uma resposta *HTTP 500 Internal Server Error* como deveria acontecer, já que não estamos levantando nenhuma `HTTPException` ou coisa parecida, mas o servidor **não terá nenhum log** ou qualquer outra indicação de qual foi o erro. 😱