// snapshot timestamp, or some other timestamp later encoded into the metadata.
        // TODO this needs to be repeated here so the merging doesn't interfere with the written metadata
        //  - we'd be much better having a pristine input, and an ongoing metadata for merging instead

        Map<ArtifactRepository, Metadata> previousMetadata = new HashMap<>();
        ArtifactRepository selected = null;

                10, // max attempts per IP (higher than default 5)
                100, // max global attempts per minute (much higher than default 20)
                Duration.ofSeconds(2), Duration.ofMinutes(1));

        try {
            final int numThreads = 10;
            final int attemptsPerThread = 5;

{% endfor %}

</div>

Although the team members have the permissions to perform privileged tasks, all the [help from others maintaining FastAPI](./help-fastapi.md#help-maintain-fastapi){.internal-link target=_blank} is very much appreciated! 🙇‍♂️

## FastAPI Experts

These are the users that have been [helping others the most with questions in GitHub](help-fastapi.md#help-others-with-questions-in-github){.internal-link target=_blank}. 🙇

   * we've chosen to instead use a signature that benefits existing users -- and is still safe.
   *
   * For convertAll, I haven't looked as closely at *how* much existing users benefit, so we should
   * keep an eye out for problems that new users encounter. Note also that convertAll could support
   * both use cases by using @PolyNull. (By contrast, we can't use @PolyNull for our superinterface

   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the map
   * at a time, but since read operations can proceed concurrently, this still yields higher
   * concurrency than full synchronization. Defaults to 4.

    }

    /**
     * Test that insufficient buffer size is properly detected.
     */
    @Test
    public void testInsufficientBufferSize() {
        byte[] tooSmallBuffer = new byte[32]; // Much smaller than required 65 bytes

        SMBProtocolDecodingException exception = assertThrows(SMBProtocolDecodingException.class, () -> {
            response.readBytesWireFormat(tooSmallBuffer, 0);
        });

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashMap}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure places significantly reduced load on the garbage
 * collector by only using a constant number of internal objects.
 *

  }

  /**
   * Returns {@code n} choose {@code k}, also known as the binomial coefficient of {@code n} and
   * {@code k}, that is, {@code n! / (k! (n - k)!)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> the result can take as much as <i>O(k log n)</i> space.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code n < 0}, {@code k < 0}, or {@code k > n}
   */
  public static BigInteger binomial(int n, int k) {
    checkNonNegative("n", n);

   * ```
   *
   * But this chain is wrong because the attackerSwitch certificate is being used in a CA role even
   * though it is not a CA certificate. There are pinned certificates in the chain! The correct
   * chain is much shorter because it skips the non-CA certificate.
   *
   * ```
   *   attackerCa
   *     -> attackerIntermediate
   *         -> phonyVictim
   * ```
   *

    assertThrows(IndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> iia3.subArray(1, 4));
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(Collection<T> collection) {