@J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // suite
  @AndroidIncompatible // test-suite builders
  public static Test suite() {
    TestSuite suite = new TestSuite();
    // TODO(lowasser): should we force TreeMultimap to be more thorough about checking nulls?
    suite.addTest(
        SortedSetMultimapTestSuiteBuilder.using(
                new TestStringSetMultimapGenerator() {
                  @Override

                u -> new OutputCapturingMockHttpURLConnection(u, "ok"));
        ForkJoinPool pool = new ForkJoinPool(1);
        req.threadPool(pool);

        // ## Act ##
        // execute() should force synchronous execution but restore threadPool afterward
        try (CurlResponse response = req.execute()) {
            assertEquals(200, response.getHttpStatusCode());
        }

        // ## Assert ##

        assertNotSame(first, second, "Should create new connection when first is disconnected");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should create new connection when force signing differs")
    void testNoReuseWithDifferentSigning() throws Exception {
        // Given: An existing connection without signing enforced

    /** Whether to use command batching for improved performance */
    protected boolean useBatching = false;
    /** Whether to use Unicode encoding for strings */
    protected boolean useUnicode = true;
    /** Force use of Unicode encoding regardless of negotiation */
    protected boolean forceUnicode = false;
    /** Whether SMB signing is preferred but not required */
    protected boolean signingPreferred = false;

 *
 * <p>Disadvantages of EventBus include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>It makes the cross-references between producer and subscriber harder to find. This can
 *       complicate debugging, lead to unintentional reentrant calls, and force apps to eagerly
 *       initialize all possible subscribers at startup time.
 *   <li>It uses reflection in ways that break when code is processed by optimizers/minimizers like

    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> ImmutableLongArray.builder(-1));
  }

  /**
   * If there's a bug in builder growth, we wouldn't know how to expose it. So, brute force the hell
   * out of it for a while and see what happens.
   */
  public void testBuilder_bruteForce() {
    for (int i = 0; i < reduceIterationsIfGwt(100); i++) {

        public static final String NON_INTERACTIVE = "non-interactive";
        public static final String BATCH_MODE = "B";
        public static final String FORCE_INTERACTIVE = "force-interactive";
        public static final String ALTERNATE_USER_SETTINGS = "s";
        public static final String ALTERNATE_PROJECT_SETTINGS = "ps";
        public static final String ALTERNATE_INSTALLATION_SETTINGS = "is";

        });
        indexUpdater.start();

        int startedCrawlerNum = 0;
        int activeCrawlerNum = 0;
        try {
            while (startedCrawlerNum < crawlerList.size()) {
                // Force to stop crawl
                if (systemHelper.isForceStop()) {
                    for (final Crawler crawler : crawlerList) {
                        crawler.stop();
                    }
                    break;

        }

        int startedCrawlerNum = 0;
        int activeCrawlerNum = 0;
        while (startedCrawlerNum < dataCrawlingThreadList.size()) {
            // Force to stop crawl
            if (systemHelper.isForceStop()) {
                for (final DataCrawlingThread crawlerThread : dataCrawlingThreadList) {
                    crawlerThread.stopCrawling();
                }

				t.Fatalf("No error should raise")
			}

			if err := tx.First(&User{}, "name = ?", user.Name).Error; err != nil {
				t.Fatalf("Should find saved record")
			}

			panic("force panic")
		})
	})

	if err := DB.First(&User{}, "name = ?", "transaction-block-3").Error; err == nil {
		t.Fatalf("Should not find record after panic rollback")
	}
}